Guest column: Net neutrality - ensuring an open internet

At a time when the US Federal Communications Commission is to vote on a rollback on the Net Neutrality Rules notified during the Obama administration, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has published its recommendations on the subject. Making headlines during the days of Zero Rating and products of the kind, and coming after nearly three years of setting up of a committee by the TRAI to make recommendations in this regard (January 2015), the document attempts to balance the interest of the general public by including ‘internet access services’ within the regulation of net neutrality and excluding “specialised services” that are “optimised for specific content, protocols or user equipment where optimisation is necessary in order to meet specific quality requirements.’’

Net neutrality, in theory, is a laudable concept. It also finds mention in the UL, VNO and ISP licensing terms notified by the Department of Telecom. The specific mention is absent from the UASL and CMTS licenses. However, this principle can nevertheless be read into the obligation to provide non-discriminatory access even by the telecom service providers. In this background, what is to be considered is whether net neutrality, with its basic principle already enshrined in the law and some contours such as specialised services yet to be clearly defined, is even required to be separately regulated.

First, net neutrality is, as stated in the recommendations, primarily to address and ensure “public internet access”. Importantly, what has not been considered is how much of this “public” of the country actually has access to broadband. The answer would be in the vicinity of 15 per cent. Of this “preferred public population,” many would be multiple connection/access holders and, hence, the effective penetration of broadband would be less than 12 per cent. With this background, the debate, rather than focusing on net neutrality, should focus on access to broadband for all. It is only when such a objective is achieved that the issue of whether or not we have a neutral internet would really need to be studied.

Second, OTT, which is one of the aspects central to the debate on net neutrality, has been currently left out for separate consideration. It is unclear, therefore, as to what position is taken vis-à-vis this very important piece of the net neutrality puzzle.

Third, it is strange that the document should pluck out internet of things, a concept and technology so nascent in India that even its mention in this document makes it conspicuous by its presence. Why is there a need for identification of such detail of a technology still under development, not only in India but in most parts of the world?

Having said the above, all the right words have been used in the recommendations–non-discriminatory access, non-provision of fast lanes, etc. All or most of these recommendations are great in theory. However, and especially with the carving out for specialised services, the workability of these recommendations, if they are to be accepted and converted into regulations, is suspect. We need to have enough cars (population access to broadband) before we can deride the provision of fast lanes.

(Abhishek Malhotra is a partner at Bharucha & Partners)

Latest Reads
Twin conditions ensure broadcasters do not engage in ‘perverse’ pricing: TRAI

Mumbai: The twin conditions introduced in the New Tariff Order (NTO) 2.0 seek to ensure that broadcasters do not engage in “perverse pricing”; that consumers do not get a raw deal; and that choices offered by and to all market participants remain real. Both conditions are important in their own...

Regulators TRAI
TRAI makes recommendations on satellite-based connectivity for low bit-rate applications

New Delhi: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has released the recommendations on "Licensing Framework for Satellite-based connectivity for low bit rate applications" for both commercial and captive usage. The recommendations come after the Department of Telecom (DoT) highlighted a...

Regulators TRAI
NBDA introduces its logo reflecting a new name

Mumbai: The News Broadcasters Association (NBA) recently changed its name to the News Broadcasters and Digital Association (NBDA) to bring within its purview digital media news broadcasters. The broadcasters body on Thursday unveiled its new logo to reflect the name change.

Regulators I&B Ministry
Apurva Chandra appointed as Secretary, I&B ministry

The Union Cabinet on Thursday appointed Apurva Chandra as secretary, ministry of information and broadcasting (I&B).

Regulators I&B Ministry
SC issues notice to TRAI in NTO 2.0 case

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a notice to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on the petitions filed by broadcasters against the Bombay high court judgment upholding the New Tariff Order (NTO) 2.0. The bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice Surya Kant, and Justice...

Regulators Supreme Court
Bombay HC stays parts of new IT rules

The Bombay high court has granted an interim stay to the implementation of parts of the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021 which require that all online publishers follow a "code of ethics" and norms of conduct.

Regulators High Court
News Broadcasters Association rechristens as News Broadcasters & Digital Association

News Broadcasters Association (NBA), the largest body of news broadcasters in the country, has decided to change its present name to 'News Broadcasters & Digital Association' (NBDA). NBA consists of the nation's top-rated news channels and commands more than 80 per cent of news television...

Regulators I&B Ministry
Bombay HC seeks government’s response over stay on IT media rules

The Bombay high court has asked the central government to submit a response as to why an interim stay should not be given to the implementation of the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021, as demanded by two petitions.

Regulators High Court
I&B ministry imposes additional penalties for violation of programme code

Mumbai: The minister of information and broadcasting, Anurag Thakur has informed the Rajya Sabha that there have been 37 instances between March 2005 and June 2021 where broadcasters were prohibited the transmission and re-transmission of a channel for a specified time period, or permission to...

Regulators I&B Ministry

Sign up for our Newsletter

subscribe for latest stories

* indicates required