Regulators

TRAI issues consultation paper on tariff for commercial subscribers

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/smartcrop_800x800/public/images/regulators-images/2014/06/11/url.jpg?itok=HqbhZw-t

MUMBAI: Three months ago, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) revised the tariff rates for non-addressable cable TV areas which allowed a rise of 27.5 per cent in two stages. While this was for non-commercial subscribers, the regulator has now issued a consultation paper asking comments from stakeholders for the same with respect to the commercial subscribers.

The consultation paper states that the tariff for commercial subscribers has been an issue since 2005 when associations of hotels and restaurants challenged the various tariffs imposed by broadcasters in the Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). Even though the TDSAT disposed off the petition stating that such organisations cannot be called consumers, it asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to think about whether or not to impose a tariff regulation on them.

While the TRAI came up with two definitions for ‘ordinary cable subscriber’ and ‘commercial cable subscriber’, the appeal was challenged in the Supreme Court which then directed TRAI to frame separate tariff ceilings for non-commercial subscribers.

Even though the Regulator had come up with definitions and categories of such commercial subscribers, it was challenged by the Federation of Hotel and Restaurants Associations of India (FHRAI).

Now, TRAI has once again come up with a fresh definition for a ‘commercial subscriber’ and has asked stakeholders if they agree to it or if they have alternative suggestions. It says that a commercial subscriber means “any person, other than a multi system operator or a cable operator, who receives broadcasting service at a place indicated by him to a broadcaster or a cable operator or direct to home operator or multi system operator or head end in the sky operator or a service provider offering Internet Protocol television service , as the case may be, and uses such signals for the benefit of his clients, customers, members or any other class or group of persons having access to its commercial establishment.”

“Commercial establishment” means any premises wherein any trade, business or profession or any work in connection with, or incidental or ancillary thereto is carried on and includes a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860), and charitable or other trust, whether registered or not, which carries on any business, trade or profession or work in connection with, or incidental or ancillary thereto, journalistic and printing establishments, educational, healthcare or other institutions run for private gain, theatres, cinemas, restaurants, eating houses, pubs, bars, residential hotels, malls, airport lounges, clubs or other places of public amusements or entertainment but does not include a shop or a factory registered under the Factories Act, 1948 (43 of 1948).”

"Shop" means any premises where goods are sold, either by retail or wholesale or where services are rendered to customers, and includes an office, a store room, godown, warehouse or work place, whether in the same premises or otherwise, mainly used in connection with such trade or business but does not include a factory, a commercial establishment, residential hotel, restaurant, eating house, theatre or other place of public amusement or entertainment.”

TRAI says that with these definitions it is shifting its focus from how the commercial establishments use the cable connection to defining it as one who avails the service from a broadcaster or a distribution platform operator (DPO).

In the earlier definition, the regulator had also divided commercial consumers into various sub-divisions of similarly placed entities depending on their size of business, paying capacity to clients etc. These were challenged several times in the past. Therefore, it has now asked stakeholders that if such a sub-division was not the right way to proceed, what would be an alternative way of dividing them into similarly placed groups.

Furthermore, three models of dealings between the commercial user and DPO has been given by TRAI and stakeholders are expected to select any one or give their own alternative model.

The first model is that the broadcaster publishes the rates for commercial tariff as a Reference Interconnect agreement (RIO) and then commercial subscriber negotiates. The second model is that the DPO publishes the rate and negotiations shall be done on the same. In the third model, both the aforesaid models shall be available to commercial customers wherein there shall be a competition among DPOs and between DPOs and broadcaster.

Furthermore, four options as regard to what shall be the tariff price have also been given:

First, the tariff for commercial subscribers is same as that for ordinary subscribers. Second, the tariff for commercial subscribers has a linkage with tariff for ordinary subscribers. Third, the tariff for commercial subscribers has no linkage with the tariff for ordinary subscribers but there are some protective measures prescribed to protect all the stakeholders. Fourth, the tariff for commercial subscribers is kept under total forbearance.

In the case of the third option several provisions have been suggested such as – broadcasters be mandated to offer all their channels on a-la-carte and specify rates. In case a broadcaster directly makes the signal available to the subscriber then the sum of a-la-carte rates of the channels shall not exceed one and a half times the rate of the bouquet of which they are a part and the a-la-carte rate of each channel should not exceed thrice the average rate of a channel of that bouquet. In case of a DPO, apart from the earlier two provisions, a-la-carte rates for all FTA channels should be uniform. The regulator also suggested that it should receive the RIO by either the broadcaster or the DPO and that a provider shall not deny channel signals unless subject to technical feasibility. 

If a stakeholder chooses the second option he/she has been asked to justify what the ceilings should be for each category of commercial subscribers.

Stakeholders have been asked to give their views by 27 June at the latest.

Click here to read full consultation paper

Latest Reads

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/30/pushpaka-vimana%20%281%29.jpg?itok=3RK3kVbv
Copyright infringement: Kross awarded injunction against 'Pushpaka Vimana', hearing on 12 Apr

The Bombay High Court has issued an ad-interim injunction restraining further exhibition and distribution of the Kannada film, “Pushpaka Vimana” in any manner or in any medium including cinema theatres, television, CDs/DVDs.

Regulators High Court
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/30/Piracy-800x800.jpg?itok=xiO-BtOm
Film piracy: Govt has no 'losses' figure, industry estimates Rs 180 bn a yr

NEW DELHI: Even as the government said that no definite data was available on losses owing to piracy “if any”, the film industry had said in mid-2016 that the Indian film industry was losing $ 2.7 billion (Rs 180 billion) every year. Minister of state for information and broadcasting Rajyavardhan...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/30/trai-infra-800x800.jpg?itok=xZzXfz3A
TRAI advises govt to aid TV infra sharing, ease 'permissions'

The Central Government should encourage sharing of infrastructure, wherever technically feasible, in TV broadcasting distribution network services, on voluntary basis including sharing of head-end used for cable TV services and transport streams transmitting signals of TV channels, among...

Regulators TRAI
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/28/madaras-high-court%20%281%29.jpg?itok=30dcEsHP
TRAI extends tariff regulations execution date, Madras High court arguments to continue

Following the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's request that its tariff regulations which were slated to come into effect on 2 April were being deferred to 2 May 2017, Star India and Vijay TV decided not to press for their pleas in view of the ongoing case in Madras hIgh Court.

Regulators TRAI
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/28/cinepramaan.jpg?itok=8JdUHJ7t
Online film certification starts, 33% rise in 'shoot' permission

NEW DELHI: A total of 41 shooting Permissions were given for foreign films/projects in 2016 which was approximately 33% increase over 2015. Stating this, the information and broadcasting minister M Venkaiah Naidu said his Ministry has been proactively taking initiatives to promote Ease of Doing...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/25/perma1_0.jpg?itok=ONl7sQoX
Notices to several Pak TV channels for 'violations'

MUMBAI: Freedom of speech is being curtailed in the sub-continent. Media watchdog Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) has issued show-cause notices to nine channels -- Waqt TV, Ab Tak TV, Channel 5, 7 News, Aaj TV, Sach TV, Roze TV, News One and Capital TV -- for airing 'fake...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/24/trai1-800x800_0%20%281%29.jpg?itok=KighZfVo
TRAI rejects complaint against free promos, says consumer comes first

The Telecom Commission’s contention that free promotional offers are responsible for the industry’s falling financial health and lower licence fee payments to the government has been rejected by the regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.

Regulators TRAI
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/24/Rjavardhan-rathor-800x800%20%282%29.jpg?itok=q1QzCcu7
No middlemen in film certification process anymore

NEW DELHI: The Indian Government has said that it has obviated the role for intermediaries/ agents in the existing as well as new online certification system. Minister of state for information and broadcasting Rajyavardhan Rathore has told the Parliament that the online system is user-friendly, and...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2017/03/23/Bigg_Boss-Khatron_ke_Khiladi.jpg?itok=CERAE8EH
28 complaints against 12 TV channels about reality shows since 2006

NEW DELHI: Twelve television channels have faced action from the Information and Broadcasting Ministry for 28 complaints relating to reality shows since 2006.

Regulators I&B Ministry

Latest News

Load More

Sign up for our Newsletter

subscribe for latest stories