|
Time:
3:30 p.m. Date: Tuesday, 26 July. Two news channel reporters discuss
how they're going to reach a theatre screening the Amitabh Bacchhan
blockbuster Sarkar on time so as not to keep their dates
waiting.
The
steady rain was making them a bit uncomfortable, but faithful Mumbaikars
that they were, they were optimistic that it would soon stop. Little
did they know that not only would they not make it to the film screening,
but would be stuck in office for the next one-and-a-half days, reporting
the happenings of a city that came under a water siege as its critical
infrastructure fell apart.
Some
kilometers away in suburban Goregoan, employees of Sahara Samay
News were busy doing routine activities when the rains started pouring
in the evening and continued unabated for the next 36 hours. In
the process, not only did their daily schedules get washed away,
but within a few hours, the whole studio got destroyed, deluged
by the rising rain waters.
But,
as they say, when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Braving
torrential rain and an indifferent state administration, news channels
got into the act on many fronts --- to keep the country up to date
on the state of Mumbai and other parts of Maharashtra; to act as
lifelines in some cases and, more importantly, to keep the on-air
emotional quotient at an even keel.
"The
watery developments took us by surprise back here in Delhi initially.
But once we assessed the situation, we pulled no punches in our
coverage. So much so that satellite phones were deployed to get
over the failing landline and cellular phone networks," Zee
Telefilms news director and head of Zee News Laxmi N Goel says.
Though
the heavy rain that brought to its knees the financial capital of
the country for a few days --- the state government says the losses
could be more than Rs 150 billion --- was certainly not as catastrophic
as the Tsunami earlier this year, it did leave a trail of misery
and a whole set of lessons to be learnt.
One
of the lessons learnt by some news channels was that technology
is an asset, but can be a liability too. India TV for example, which
as an innovation had filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt doing reporting duty
to record the human side of the story, found to its dismay that
heavy rains disrupted its KU-band equipped digital satellite news
gathering functions.
Admits
India TV chairman Rajat Sharma, "We had to face difficulties
sending feeds directly to the satellite or to the broadcast centre
in Noida (on the outskirts of Delhi) as KU-band technology gets
affected by rain. Thankfully we managed alternatives."
But
rain or no rain, technology failing or not, the news channels had
their forces out in full reporting from various places in the city
under extremely trying circumstances.
Aaj
Tak, the country's No. 1 news channel in terms of market share,
had 13 reporters and 12 cameramen out in the field who were working
in tandem with stringers spread across the state.
Indeed,
reporters did face problems with respect to communications but broke
through the physical obstacles, and waded through the waters. And
as the mobile network died on them for the first 24 hours, reporters
used landlines wherever possible.
Says
Aaj Tak's Mumbai bureau chief Shishir Joshi, "All endeavors
were made to deliver information very objectively and to avoid causing
further panic amongst the Mumbaikars."
Illustrating
the situation following the rumours that hit Mumbaikars in the aftermath
of the 26 July deluge, which caused widespread panic, Joshi points
out that the channel kept a constant flow of announcements going
rubbishing the stories circulating as untrue.
The
channel had an exclusive showcase of the situation on the day of
the catastrophe; the reporter cum cameraman presented his diary
as he commuted from Nariman Point to Andheri. Roving with the crowd,
aiming to give viewers the experience of what the people felt after
they were hit by the deluge.
The
channel provided coverage showcasing both the sides of the fence,
speaking to local authorities, and affected people. Joshi avers,
"Aaj Tak was first to hit the screen with the report on the
calamity that struck Kalyan and informing the viewers about the
possible dangers ahead."
He
adds that the channel covered all pockets of Mumbai, objectively
and bringing precise information. The channel also initiated scrolls
and tickers with messages informing about the welfare of their loved
ones.
Wannabe
numero uno Star News had a team of 30 reporters and four OB vans
reporting in from various points, Star News marketing manager Yogesh
Manwani reveals. Zee News, taking advantage of the parent company
(Zee Telefilms) being headquartered in Mumbai, deployed several
crews with four OB vans, while India TV had 18 reporters and an
equal number of camerapersons out in the field.
Sahara Samay Mumbai, despite shifting base to Delhi partially, left
no stone unturned for maximum coverage. Its news head Ajay Pandey
asserts that along with stringers all over the state, over 50 correspondents
were covering the calamity. Fledgling Channel 7 also used this as
an opportunity to connect with viewers in the metropolis with over
10 crews fanning out in the city.
Star
News, the only channel that has its headquarters in Mumbai, proudly
asserts that despite failing communication network due to power
outages "we have done far more justice to the havoc than any
other channel."
Commenting
on the coverage, Manwani offers, "The stories largely witnessed
spot reporting. The team managed to go to the far ends of Mumbai
and also the inaccessible areas to bring in a feel of the exact
situation in the affected areas."
Star
News extensively employed the usage of its all-weather camera perched
on the Star building in Mahalaxmi suburb. "The all-weather
camera was employed as a backdrop to keep people informed on the
situation of the overcast sky," he adds.
Talking
about the logistics involved in Zee News' coverage, channel editor
Alka Saxena says, "Zee news deployed 12 reporters and these
reporters continously worked for a whole week, some even staying
in office for four days at a stretch. The hurdles were the same
as faced by hundreds of thousands of Mumbaikars, of travelling and
keeping equipment safe from rains. Our reporters' responsibilities
were much more of coverage, safety and sending footage to office
and OB vans. Some of the reporters even walked 10-12 km and brought
footage to the office. We had two OB vans and two office links working
continuously for the whole week."
"On
Tuesday, when the mayhem began, the most difficult was movement
as the whole of Mumbai came to a standstill. Reporters had to literally
wade through Mumbai to cover the crisis. We had to save our equipment
and also save ourselves from flooding waters. Tuesday and Wednesday
were the toughest days," says Saxena.
Elaborating
on the coverage aspects, she adds that apart for carrying stories,
walkthroughs and live reports in all the bulletins from various
locations throughout the week. Zee News dedicated almost the entire
day to Mumbai rains when the crisis began, We kept changing our
montage as the story developed from 'mumbai mein barish ka kehar'
on first day to '100 crore paani mein' the next day to 'Musibat
Mein Mumbai,' on the third day when along with rains the ONGC disaster
took place, once things improved our montage changed to 'Patri Par
Lauti Zindagi'.
Commenting
on the travails of reporting such natural calamities, Channel 7
chief operating officer Piyush Jain says, "Over the last one
week, in my opinion, the toughest day for the correspondents would
have been on 1 August because of the wind pressure that mounted.
(According to media reports the Meteorological office specified
that the winds will continue to blow at about 50 km per hour.)
The
incessant rains also brought in problems of other sorts for the
news channels. That of programming. How long can you keep on showing
water logged areas and heavy rain hitting the window pane? So from
`Musibet Mein Mumbai' (on India TV where filmmaker Bhatt brought
out some unsung heroes) to `Mumbai Haha Kar' (on Channel 7) to Nightline
(Sahara Samay Mumbai), the news channels conceived current affairs
programming to go beyond the news and the obvious.
Star
News initiated a special effort wherein the channel designed a theme
revolving around viewers narrating their experiences, which were
all brought live on screen by reporters and sometimes by viewers
who where brought to the studio to comprehend the administrative
apathy that they went through.
Star
News on 27 July was the first to deliver news on the Sakinaka landslides.
When quizzed that other channels also claim to have been on the
spot, Manwani points out, "Well, compare the footage and the
time of delivery of the news."
Star
News reporters remained to file in reports despite a few of them
personally having faced property losses during the calamity. Seven
of the channel's camera equipments were also damaged. Manwani adds,
"One of our correspondents remained stationed at the airport
for 36 hours aiming to bring information to the viewers on the situation."
The
channel faced no technical difficulties and were all prepared with
a back-up in case of breakdown in technical or satellite communication,
says the spokesperson.
What
about the international news channels like the BBC and CNN? According
to BBC South Asia Bureau chief Paul Danahar, the network's Mumbai
correspondent reported round the clock for the BBC World, radio
and on-line service. The Mumbai flood was the biggest story on our
South Asia edition of bbcnews.com getting out to hundreds of thousands
of readers from across the world, six times the number of any other
story on the site. Along with being broadcast on BBC World, it was
also big news in the UK, making all the main BBC TV bulletins."
For
CNN New Delhi bureau chief Satinder Bindra, who hit Mumbai's streets
on Wednesday, the main challenge was getting to the heart of the
flood-affected areas. Says
Bindra, "We used our own portable, light-weight digital news
gathering gear to broadcast live from the field. Making sure we
got the most accurate information to report and to ensure that we
passed that information onto our audiences around the world. Each
day was tough because of the logistical challenges of getting around
in Mumbai. We tried to focus on the central part of the city, including
Saki Naka, and other affected suburban areas which saw widespread
damage and loss to property and life."
Bindra stressed on the importance CNN attached to the story, "It
was the lead or second lead story in many of our newscasts. This
was the situation for several days. Our news producers were aware
of how important it was to show the world the challenges and the
resilience of the people of Mumbai during the natural disaster.
Bindra points to a particular incident that touched and moved him.
"We were in Saki Naka and we met and spoke to a 14-year-old
boy, Mohammed Afzal, who had lost nine members of his family due
to the floods. The story was very human and conveyed to audiences
the plight faced by individuals like him during this catastrophe.
We ran the story 15 times on CNN International."
As
regards damages, Sahara Samay Mumbai was the worst hit of all the
news channels. Sahara Samay Mumbai vice-president Rajiv Bajaj did
admit that though the calculations are still on, initial estimates
put the company losses at over Rs 500 million in the form of damaged
infrastructure, including the Goregaon studio and costly technical
equipment.
Sahara
Samay Mumbai was nonfunctional for two days from 26 July but still
managed to get stories up on air via their Noida hub. Says Bajaj,
"In the end, we did cope well and sprang back into action by
operating from the Atlanta Building (Sahara Samay Rashtriya's Mumbai
bureau) at Nariman Point."
Still,
as they say, the spirit of Mumbai lies in its people and not its
politicians. So the 'thank yous' that the news channels received
in response to their coverage and acts of kind deeds made up for
the difficult conditions under which professional duties were undertaken.
The
channels also did their bit. If Star News organized food and other
daily essentials for some water-logged areas of Mumbai, Channel
7 got a high when it managed organise Navy rescue teams with inflatable
lifeboats in the Santa Cruz area on 1 August. Of course, almost
all channels ran tickers with distress messages from relatives for
those stranded in Mumbai, flight details and other information that
could be used by people who had power supply in their areas and
could watch cable television.
(Despite
several attempts over the last 24 hours, NDTV declined to offer
any inputs to this report.)
|