|
The
action is heating up in the English entertainment
space, but action adventure specialist AXN is game
for the challenge. And a challenge it is to keep the
buzz going, more so in times when viewers are so spoilt
for choice. And while AXN's overall share in this
space may have witnessed a dip since last year, viewers
are clearly spending more time on the channel. An
indication that the genre as a whole is expanding.
A
look at the progress that AXN has made and where it
stands today.
Ratings
Scenario:
Tam data c&s15+ five Metros shows that viewers
are spending comparatively more time on AXN. In March
2005 they spent 17 minutes on it compared with 15.27
minutes last September and 11.07 minutes in September
2003.
In
2004, during the prime band 8-11 pm AXN had a 57.1
per cent share among English general entertainment
channels followed by Star World with 31.4 per cent
and Zee Cafe with 11.4 per cent.
Data
tracked up till 30 June 2005 indicates that so far
this year, AXN's share has dipped to 51.6 per cent
while Star World has increased to 35.5 per cent and
Zee Cafe is also up at 12.9 per cent channel share.
It
must be pointed out that none of AXN's shows have
managed to breach the rating of 1 which was achieved
by Star World's Koffee With Karan. Also, for
this year the average rating of the top shows on AXN
has fallen.
A
look at the top shows on AXN shows that programmes
with a high T&A quotient is a hot draw for AXN.
The Hot 'n' Wild band has done well with shows
like Wild On and Bikini Destinations.
The
top 20 shows on AXN
|
2004
|
2005
|
|
Show
|
TVR
|
Show
|
TVR
|
| Wild
On |
0.65 |
Mummy
Returns |
0.46 |
| 30
Seconds To Fame |
0.62 |
World's
Most Extreme |
0.41 |
| 30
Seconds To Fame |
0.59 |
Maximum
Exposure |
0.36 |
| Beastmaster |
0.54 |
Bikini
Destinations |
0.36 |
| Extreme
Variety |
0.52 |
Ripley's
believe It Or Not |
0.35 |
| 30
Seconds To Fame |
0.50 |
Spiderman |
0.35 |
| Wild
On |
0.50 |
Guinness
World Records |
0.33 |
| Guinness
World Records |
0.50 |
Mile
High |
0.33 |
| 30
Seconds To Fame |
0.50 |
Extreme
Variety |
0.32 |
| 30
Seconds To Fame |
0.48 |
Bikini
Destinations |
0.32 |
| Ripley's
Believe It Or Not |
0.47 |
David
Blaine's Vertigo |
0.32 |
| Fear
Factor |
0.45 |
Guinness
World Records |
0.31 |
| Wild
On |
0.44 |
Celebrities
Uncensored |
0.30 |
| David
Blaine Magicman |
0.44 |
Alias |
0.30 |
| Godzilla
(dubbed) |
0.42 |
Ripley's
Believe It Or Nor |
0.29 |
| Maximum
Exposure |
0.42 |
Guinness
World Records |
0.29 |
| Fear
Factor |
0.42 |
Hollow
Man |
0.29 |
| Worlds
feakiest Foods |
0.42 |
Bikini
Destinations |
0.29 |
| Ripley's
Believe It Or Not |
0.41 |
Hollywoods
Greatest Stunts |
0.29 |
| Godzilla |
0.41 |
Tremors |
0.28 |
The
programming strategy:
AXN's programme mix is designed around reality shows,
action shows, adventure shows and dramas. The strategy,
as is the case with the competitors, is to constantly
launch shows that reach a certain standard. If something
does not work you move on to something else.
Its
biggest properties are in two blocks - Prime Zone
and X-Zone. Prime Zone, which caters
to more discerning viewers, is where one can catch
shows like 24 and CSI.
In
fact, CSI has helped attract women to the channel
because it is intelligent in nature. 24 meanwhile,
broke new ground in terms of narrative with each episode
representing an hour in the life of a secret agent.
The only difficulty here is that if a viewer misses
an episode then he/she loses the thread.
In
the X-Zone, which is more mass based, it showcases
reality shows like The Amazing Race and Fear
Factor.
Earlier
this year it aired the boxing based reality show The
Contender. The show dealt with 16 boxers competing
for the chance to win $ 1 million and go professional,
Episodes ran less than 24 hours after their initial
broadcast in the US on NBC. However, this did not
help bring in the viewers.
And
while The Contender has failed to find a spot
in AXN's top rung, additionally, even A list shows
like CSI and 24 do not figure. Certainly,
the channel has its work cut out to ramp up viewership
for these high profile properties.
But
what has been a safe proposition for the channel has
clearly been the reality bandwagon. Speaking
on the role that reality has played, AXN South Asia
director marketing Rohit Bhandari says, "When
we introduced reality television through Who Dares
Wins way back in 1999 the other channels laughed
at us. There was plenty of scepticism. Now a lot of
channels, be it music or general entertainment, have
hopped on board the reality bandwagon. We have all
the major reality shows with us apart from an American
Idol which does not fit our profile. Reality shows
are what I would call 'big fish' programming."
With
a view to make the best connect to the viewer, the
channel constantly looks at innovative ways to schedule
its shows. This has meant re-looking at when primetime
shows should start. In 2003 it defined prime time
as starting from 10 pm instead of 9 pm (working on
the assumption that its core viewers get home later
than 9).
However,
last year it decided to start its primetime programme
block from 8 pm. It is worth noting that this move
was not just for India but also for South Asia. So
the likes of CSI, 24 and Alias
were moved from 10 pm to 8 pm. Bhandari says that
the aim is to cast as wide a net as possible. While
the drama shows are 'small fish' at least as compared
to the reality genre, they help maintain a high level
of quality on the channel.
|

One
of AXN's high quality shows is the action packed
24
|
Earlier
this year, it introduced a new block Platinum Showcase.
This is where shows that are more niche and cutting
edge air. The first show that aired in this block
was The 4400. This show has a sci-fi bent to
it.
While
most of the show are American, the channel states
that it is blind to the origin so long as the show
has quality, is action oriented and is aspirational.
If one was to look beyond the action label, the underlying
quality to all AXN's shows is aspirational.
Going
Beyond TRPs:
Information available with Indiantelevision.com
indicates that the channel earned in the region
of Rs 150 million last year from ad sales. Lodestar
Media's Arpita Menon says that advertisers use AXN
primarily to target the male audience SEC A,B. Group
M's Manas Mishra says that, as is the case with the
other niche English general entertainment channels,
the loyal base is too small to get advertisers excited
beyond a point. "Of
course petroleum brands as well as the likes of Mountain
Dew and Pepsi will be associated with it at one point
or another as there is a brand fit. While brands like
these buy AXN seperately, at other times it is bought
as an add on when deals are done with Sony and other
channels in the One Alliance bouquet."

The
brain behind The Contender and The Amazing
Race Mark Burnett |
While
AXN has managed to attract some women viewers, planners
prefer to take Zoom in terms of a niche channel if
women are the main target audience. Planners state
that in terms of ROI, if one looks purely at the numbers,
then one would never be able to justify spends. For
any niche channel one should use the concept of Quality
Rating Points (QRPs) and not TRPs. Here one looks
at loyalty, stickiness and channel skew.
In
terms of properties that are attractive Menon says,
"The block that I call horror programming like
Fear Factor is a good proposition. Also I like
what they do with the reality genre in terms of shows
like Who Dares Wins. Then there is
the late night Hot 'n' Wild slot."

Contestants
run an Amazing Race on AXN |
Planners
state that within the existing niche, AXN has its
own unique space. It delivers better on the Male SEC
A kind of audience compared with the competition.
At the same time some shows do reach SEC B as well.
Therefore,
for a typically male niche brand like Frenchie X,
it makes sense to have a presence on the channel.
Whether AXN gets selected over Star World and Zee
Cafe is just a matter of choice however. AXN has a
good duplication with the infotainment audience as
it is aspirational. So now if a brand does not have
infotainment in its plan then AXN can add more value
by giving more incremental reach.
What
is interesting is that Star World and Zee Cafe
have a different TG for advertisers from AXN.
Star World is seen by some observers to be more of
a family channel compared to AXN which is seen as
a strong vehicle to target men in the 25-54 age group.
That is not entirely the case with Star World and
Zee Cafe where teenagers will tune in to see the likes
of Friends and Caroline In The City.
However
the flip side to all this is that observers feel that
the way AXN is being run, the channel will not see
substancial growth in ad revenues going forward. According
to these observers, it is imperative that AXN is marketed
and sold by understanding the need of the client and
not just by selling the strengths of the channel.
Sony executive vice president (ad sales & revenue
management) Rohit Gupta maintains that the channel
is already doing that. "We do a lot of brand
integration with clients like Nokia and Samsung both
on-air and on-ground. Due to our on-ground efforts
(which will be discussed later on in this piece) we
are able to integrate clients better as compared with
the other English general entertainment channels.
While I cannot give you figures our rates in the last
two quarters have gone up quite a bit because viewer
loyalty has grown."
A
look at the shares of English entertainment channels
for this year 8-11 pm c&s 15+ five Metros.
|
Channel
|
TVR
|
Share
in the English Entertainment genre
|
| Star
Movies |
0.15
|
24.7
|
| HBO |
0.13
|
21.2
|
| Discovery
|
0.08
|
13.7
|
| AXN |
0.06
|
11
|
| NGC |
0.06
|
8.75
|
| Animal
Planet |
0.05
|
8.2
|
| Star
World |
0.05
|
7.5
|
| Zee
Studio |
0.03
|
4.1
|
| Zee
Cafe |
0.02
|
2.7
|
| History
Channel |
0.02
|
2.7
|
| Discovery
Travel And Living |
0.02
|
2.7
|
Getting
all Hot 'n' Wild:
One area that AXN has built is the late night slot
post 11 pm which it dubbed the Hot'n' Wild
band. This enabled the channel to push itself as a
lifestyle brand, Bhandari states. As has been earlier
stated, it is also one of the channel's key properties
from an advertising perspective.
This
post 11 pm slot kicked off first with two shows Are
You Hot? and Wild On. This
saw AXN getting a shade bolder. The band, which
was first introduced in 2003, constantly throws up
new show concepts aimed at tantalising the senses.
One show was the two part World's Sexiest Commercials.
Viewers
could also gorge on more late night escapism in the
form of Bikini Destinations.
Hot
'n' Wild goes desi:
Arguably localisation through on-ground endeavours
is where AXN has scored the most over its rivals.
Group M's Mishra feels that this is the best way for
brand AXN to move forward in terms of trying to grow
ad revenue. Localisation is the one area where clients
have felt a definite reward in being associated. Reality
shows were used as bait to give audiences a chance
to live out their action fantasies. They were thus
provided with the X-effect the tagline one can argue
was inspired by the deodorant Axe Effect.

The
hosts of AXN's ground show Extreme Dhamaka |
It
all started in 2002 when it brought former cricketer
turned TV host Mike Whitney down to India for the
localised version of Who Dares Wins. It also
held the Guinness World Records. The Whitney
show reached a TV audience of 9.25 million people,
which according to the channel represents 43 per cent
of India's total A class population.
One
main reason for the success of the show was that it
targeted the "average Ravi". The channel
was not looking for experts performing stunts. It
was looking to give the viewer a chance to experience
the buzz first hand that it keeps talking about on
air. Bhandari says, "Viewers were given a chance
to actually touch and feel the brand. Who Dares
Wins - India was one of our first initiatives
because viewers were familiar with Mike and Tania
on air."
In
2003, the budget for localisation went up by 50 per
cent. The first initiative in 2003 was to find India's
Hot 'n' Wild couple. A search was conducted
to find a man and woman who felt that they were hot
and had what it took to host a TV show. The search
took almost two months and saw 5,000 entries.
The
winners of Hot 'n'Wild hosted (alongside Who
Dares Wins hosts Whiteney and Tania Zaetta) the
six city on-ground event Extreme Dhamaka. This
was a combination of Who Dares Wins and Fear
Factor.
According
to Bhandari, the
budget for Extreme Dhamaka was the same as
buying two to three quality series from the US and
airing it. What was unique was that everything from
conceptualisation to post production was done in India.
Repetition
a no-no:
AXN has been careful not to repeat itself. Its decision
not to repeat Hot 'n' Wild in 2004 was governed
in part by the fact that lots of other channels like
MTV and Channel [V] were doing hunts of their own.
As
Bhandari says, "We were the first to make a noise
about the potential of reality hunts. Then the biggest
players (read Star and Sony) started shouting loudly.
For us to then try and outshout them made no sense
at all. We have to be slightly careful when it comes
to localisation. The viewer after all comes to us
expecting something specific that he will not get
anywhere else."
The
channel therefore decided that for its next on-ground
initiative in 2004 it would put a twist on the India-Pakistan
rivalry with AXN Xtreme: India vs Pakistan
Challenge.
Dual
experience of brand AXN:
The earlier mentioned on-ground initiatives have helped
the channel create two experiences. There is both
an intended as well as an actual experience. The former
is what you go through when you view the channel.
The actual one is what you face on the ground. This
year the channel is looking to do another local version
of Ultimate Guinness Records. However it will
not be pushing it as a reality show. but as
an action show.
Marketing
activity needs to be beefed up?
Having good content is one thing. Doing innovations
to create the required level of awareness is another.
This is where AXN needs to cover ground is the commonly
expressed industry perception. Observers maintain
that in order to get an increase in viewership that
goes beyond a CSI which is already well known,
the channel needs to market itself more. As an observer
says, "AXN is being treated like an under dog
in the Sony bouquet. None of the on-air programming
is marketed at the desired level for viewers and advertisers,
especially when you look at the kind of marketing
innovations that Sony and Max do.

Jennifer
Garner stars in the action pakced Alias |
"Not
many media guys knew about the scope of The Contender.
In terms of revenue it was a missed opportunity. It
could have been sold the way Koffee With Karan
was sold for Star World i.e. by charging a premium
and then offering spots on other shows as add ons.
For this to happen the media fraternity needs to be
made more aware about what is going on. For CSI:NY
I don't think that many potential people, be it viewers
or media planners, are aware that a new version of
one of its most popular shows is on air."
Bhandari
expresses surprise at this perception though. "Whenever
we have a big property we get in touch with clients
a couple of months in advance. For The Contender
we had sent a boxing kit to the agencies. We had over
60 billboards in Mumbai. One would have to be blind
to have missed it. At the same time from the cost
benefit ratio point of view it does not make sense
to have a campaign going on for beyond a month. It
is important to remember that there is a limit to
the number of viewers that great advertising attracts
for niche channels."
AXN
as a tourism vehicle:
There is a certain amount of cachet that the AXN brand
offers as far as associations are concerned. For this
reason tourism departments of other Asian countries
are waking up to its potential. For instance last
year AXN teamed up with the Hong Kong Tourism Board
to take viewers through a Bollywood Odyssey
Hosted by former Miss World Diana Hayden the show
took viewers to Hong Kong locales that Bollywood film
producers have made use of. Films like Company,
Naam, Gumrah have all had important
sequences shot in Hong Kong in locations like Victoria
Harbour and The Peak. Prior to that AXN had organised
the India Challenge event in conjunction with
the HKTB. The winning team was then sent to Hong Kong
to compete in the Hong Kong AXN Challenge.
Conclusion:
Clearly AXN needs to find increasingly innovative
ways to get the message out about the properties it
has. After all in an increasingly fragmented market
the viewer needs to be reminded about key properties.
It would also seem that the channel would do well
to more closely examine its ad sales strategy to better
leverage the brand. On a more positive note it is
on the right track as far as localisation through
on-ground initiatives are concerned.
|