|
Jaipal
Reddy's second inning at the information and broadcasting
ministry has one similarity --- nothing much has changed
since the time he was last here in 1997 when the United
Front was in power at the Centre for a brief period.
Some basic issues --- like bringing about true autonomy
in Prasar Bharati and a regulatory framework for the
chaotic broadcast and cable sector --- still linger
on having made little progress under successive ministers.
In that sense, Reddy could begin from where he left
off in the last decade.
However, it is easier said than done for Reddy. As
was the case during his last stint at Shastri Bhawan,
which houses the I&B ministry in the Capital,
he was a minister in a coalition government and this
time round too the allies of the Congress are unlikely
to make life easy for any minister. Having to deal
with the Left parties and regional satraps the likes
of Laloo Prasad Yadav is not going to be easy street
for Reddy.
What should be the priorities for Reddy this time
round? If we at indiantelevision.com know a little
about Reddy, then two thing could be taken for granted:
he is unlikely to be an overzealous moral policeman
(the likes of FTV and Trendz can heave a sigh of relief)
and is not susceptible to corporate pressure for policy
formulation.
Having said that, one would also like the new minister
to take a definite stand on issues like the payment
of license fee by private radio FM players, most of
whom have been trying to put pressure on the government
to waive the annual fee, which became payable on 30
April. Since most private FM radio stations are operated
by big media organisations, the I&B ministry and
its bureaucrats have been under intense pressure to
rule in the former's favour.
Talks of persistent phone calls from senior editors
of organisations to bureaucrats in the I&B ministry
on the issue were an oft-heard allegation. Though
the sector regulator had suggested to the previous
government to keep the license fee in abeyance till
related issues are settled formally, Reddy needs to
send out immediate signals that the government cannot
be taken for granted and his ministry put under pressure
to do something that may take quite some time. His
immediate message to private FM radio players ought
to be: withdraw the court cases, pay up the license
fee now and the government would look into their grievances
and suggestions from an expert panel on FM radio on
priority.
Media houses may just be warned that Reddy is not
a wimp because beneath the soft exterior, he hides
a tough will. Remember the banning of reception of
KU-band signals for DTH services way back in 1997
even when the then top honchos of Star TV were busy
convincing Reddy the pitfalls of such a ban. At that
time, the government and Reddy were convinced that
Star TV was trying to cock a snook at the government
on the DTH issue by holding a press conference and
giving out ads to newspapers, even as the government
said it was contemplating a legislation relating to
DTH.
After having taken care of the FM radio (license)
issue, Reddy also needs to look at the controversial
CAS. Considering that his own party, the Congress,
and one of its key allies, the Left parties, were
against hasty implementation of addressability, it
is expected that the new minister would tread cautiously,
unlike his immediate predecessor Ravi Shankar Prasad,
who despite the best of efforts could not shake off
the (bad?) legacy that he inherited from an authoritarian
Sushma Swaraj.
Again, treading cautiously is something easier said
than done for this government. First, though the I&B
ministry bureaucrats are likely to advise against
implementation of CAS through a legislation, totally
ignoring it would be difficult for Reddy. Simply because
CAS has been mandated through a legislation okayed
by Parliament. That it was Swaraj who steam-rolled
it through both the Houses of Parliament like a woman
possessed is another story.
Second, the cable fraternity is not going to take
very kindly to Reddy's dithering on CAS. At the end
of the day, it was on a government's insistence that
the cable industry made investments in infrastructure
for CAS rollout.
How would Reddy explain away such investments is
something that needs to be seen. What is more important,
is the way Reddy handles the cable fraternity and
the broadcasters. There is a feeling that Prasad failed
to 'manage' the broadcasters properly on the CAS issue.
Since it could be termed Reddy's baby, he could well
work towards making Prasar Bharati, India's pubcaster,
truly autonomous. He could begin by dusting the cobwebs
off an expert panel's (headed by the late Shunu Sen)
recommendation on improving the functioning of Doordarshan
and All India Radio, which he had himself commissioned
during his last stint.
Moreover, Reddy needs to get out of the "filmi
chakkar" as I&B minister because the media
and entertainment industry is not just restricted
to films only.
Considering Reddy also has the additional charge
of the department of culture, originally under the
human resources department, he could sit down with
organisational heads of the likes of the Censor Board
to chalk out a broad plan on Indian culture, its portrayal
on various sectors of the media, including TV, and
preferably bring in a more liberal cultural outlook.
Even with the seeming whittling down of power of
the I&B ministry, the fact remains that this organization
is of utmost importance to a government even if Prasar
Bharati is given full autonomy. Because there are
several others units of the ministry that can be easily
and effectively used for propaganda.
What is heartening with Reddy at the helm of the
I&B ministry is that we would see less of grand
standing and more of serious work. Even if that means
less colourful copy for the media from a man who is
very academic in his approach.
|