|
|
|
| Interview with media
education consultant Shashidhar Nanjundaiah |
| |
|
"One
of the most important traits of a broadcast journalist is
the maturity to put responsibility before the anxiety of speed"
|
 |
|
| Posted
on 2 September 2003 |
| |
|
Shashidhar
Nanjundaiah, returned from New York in June 2001 to take over as
the director of the Symbiosis Institute of Mass Communication, Pune.
Nanjundaiah, who recently left Symbiosis, brought in a dual emphasis
on classroom and industry training, integrating US and Indian curricular
structures at SIMC. He taught television management, news analysis,
media research and other television-related courses to postgraduate-level
students in India and the USA, before which he Headed Research Department
in Zee News and later was Consultant Director for a New York-based
media company with interests in television production, newspapers,
online advertising and Internet FM radio.
At
Symbiosis, Nanjundaiah laid extra emphasis on research along with
sustained emphasis on practical training and meaningful in-session
industry experience. The research approach, he contends, will lead
to substantiated learning and structured thinking processes. The
20-odd seminars and conferences that he spearheaded on behalf of
SIMC have reflected this philosophy, blending intellectual thinking
and practical application. During his tenure, SIMC's applicant pool
grew by 55 per cent, and the turnover grew by nearly 1.8 times.
Nanjundaiah
left SIMC recently and is a consultant to a few upcoming institutes.
In an interview with indiantelevision.com's Aparna Joshi, Nanjundaiah
held forth on the current status of media education in the country
and the course it is likely to take. Excerpts -:
|
| |
|
Is
the trend veering towards students opting for broadcast journalism
rather than print?
I'd
put the ratio today at about 60-40 in favour of broadcast. Television
journalism became a fashionable choice after the Kargil war but
there has been some caution among students after the controversial
reportage of the Gujarat riots. Every other journalist today seems
to have a role model, usually a Rajdeep Sardesai or a Barkha Dutt
or a Karan Thapar. Generation Y wants to have the excitement of
being glamorous, yet making an immediate difference to society.
As media education attains some degree of professionalism, including
pre-admission counselling, some industry exposure etc, many students
are returning to print. Additionally, the print industry has performed
better than expected last year. Print students are usually more
passionate journalists than ambitious mediapersons, and thankfully
their tribe hasn't seen too much decline.
|
| |
|
Is
it a healthy trend or is it a herd mentality?
The trend toward TV journalism has so far been fickle and superficial,
based on top recall and an impressionable mind's perception of "visible
adventure". The element of immediacy plays a significant role in
the youngster's mind, and above all, s/he knows that unlike in previous
generations, the goal is eminently attainable. It's been a herd
mentality but then it's only reflective of an overall failure amongst
educators in predicting trends responsibly, or in educating the
student on important peripherals like career counselling.
My own claim is that it is upto us educators to balance that enthusiasm
with proper grounding, with good training in roles and responsibilities
of a journalist. Supplementing these efforts could be an active
encouragement for the students to channel their enthusiasm responsibly
in a stream that is both viable as well as appealing. If this doesn't
ensue right away, we will run the peril of churning out half-baked
journalists. There are enough jobs in each stream, but institutes
must discern the picture cleverly and translate industry trends
into enrolment numbers, rather than create rigid "quotas" for each
specialization.
|
| |
|
What
are the intrinsic qualities needed to be a good broadcast journalist?
Let's look at some of the reporting that occurred over the recent
blasts in Mumbai, and we can decipher what was lacking. Responsible
recognition of news can be different for the broadcast journalist
and the print journalist, since the former is often live and there
is not enough time for verification. So, I'll argue that one of
the most important traits of a broadcast journalist is the maturity
to put responsibility before the anxiety of speed. The ability to
independently analyse news while being thoroughly objective is perhaps
another important quality. Having said that, I argue that this is
a skill that can be developed before a journalist steps onto the
field.
Scholarly and industry research can be a big shot in the arm of
this learning curve, and clearly, there's not enough of it in our
country: both ground themselves in a historical, geographic and
contextual background, both take snapshots in a live but verifiable
context, analyse the findings of those snapshots, and leave you
with possibilities for the future. A good journalist communicates
effectively without being either esoteric, pompous or overly simplistic.
Then there are other acquired skills such as "visual sense", keeping
the output in mind while gathering news, etc.
|
| |
|
Are
there enough good training institutes for broadcast journalists
in India?
It's like any normal business. Most private institutes have jumped
on the bandwagon over the past few years because they see a large
potential market, and are anxious to reap short-term benefits. Overemphasis
on short-term profitability and constant pressure to reduce the
turnaround period can be very dangerous for the society and for
the profession. Only a couple of postgraduate institutes in India
seem to have realized that broadcast education is quite capital-intensive,
and that returns will ensue only from quality educational input.
But even so, with proper research so sorely lacking in our country,
I have yet to come across an investor who has tried to envision
new methods, predict trends, create journalists who will make a
difference. Media industry and media education must evolve together.
Currently, education either follows industry trends or is detached
from them. University colleges are too archaic and detached from
the real world, and "quickie" private institutes have merely become
tools-oriented ancillary units to the industry with no critical
analysis of its intrinsic needs. We need a well-researched mix of
theoretical and practical, classroom and field, academic and industry
experience.
|
| |
| "Generation
Y wants to have the excitement of being glamorous, yet making
an immediate difference to society" |
 |
|
| |
|
You
once said that 'it is through this grassroots-level mass communication
that our multicultural nation will grow towards a unified society'
- are our institutes helping towards this? What more is needed?
Deterministically speaking, mass communication plays a dual role
in our society. On the one hand, it fragments the society on ideological
grounds. But on the other hand, it unites the society by creating
an awareness in people, cultures and societies about each other.
Can we effectively segment news audiences as we're trying to do
now? News diffusion studies show that interpersonal communication
plays a dominant part in spreading information, once the media have
done their part. And inevitably embedded in news is culture, society
and ideology. As our economic world is trying to remove political
boundaries, the media have only consolidated their nationalistic
perspective.
Take the US government's recent use of the media to control information
in the Iraq conflict. The media have been willing partners in this
toward an ideological end. We need an environment for independent
media as unifiers, not dividers of the society. At the same time,
it is essential that the media be responsible in balancing truth-telling
with social sensitivity--otherwise the society suffers the consequences.
This can emerge only out of a solid overview that is learned before
entering the profession.
|
| |
|
Is
radio being forgotten as a tool of mass communication - are there
institutes which focus on modern day needs of radio broadcasting,
and is enough awareness going around?
Sadly, radio has re-emerged tentatively and in an environment of
hostile policies and low ad rates, because of which the industry
is struggling to make money. High-paying jobs in radio are hard
to come by, and therefore the medium hasn't taken the student community
by storm. But the buzz is true and as policies turn more industry-friendly,
good talent will follow. At an immediate strategy level, radio must
be made to pervade our homes, and grab us by the ear-drums, if you
will.
If we hear mindless banter and songs that repeat themselves silly,
it serves the purpose of building opinion leadership among the target
groups. Radio can then expand to other targets. Importantly, however,
FM radio in its traditional form (not disseminated over the Internet,
that is) can be a strong force in binding communities together.
Even devoid of news, FM has the potential to build converging local
cultures from which can evolve social action. Mass communication
institutes are gearing up for radio carefully, and institutes that
can afford digital recording and editing technology are taking the
lead. But most institutes coach their students only in radio-jockeying
or diction. Important, but not complete.
|
| |
|
Is mass communication education geared to meet the needs of regional
television in this country? What more could be done in this regard?
Advertisers are beginning to look at eyeball numbers more seriously
than perception-based allotments, and as regional programming gains
momentum, so will the popularity of regional television. Our country
is unusual in that you can sit in a Chennai living room and watch
a Bengali channel. The spectrum capacity has allowed for that kind
of footprint distribution, and it's a great opportunity. For all
that, there is not a single private institute worth the name providing
training in regional-language scripting or regional issues.
This is where government-funded university colleges or institutes
like IIMC will score through their regional-language training. At
SIMC, I tried to insist that each candidate must either be or become
bilingual at the end of the programme. Most channels today expect
institutes to provide that training, but end up relying on in-house
training or default knowledge.
|
| |
| |
| Click
for more MAM interviews |
| |
|
|
|
|
|