Interview with WPP marketing communications south Asia CEO Andre Nair
 

"If I'm not going to get more audiences, why should I pay more?"

Posted on 10 May 2003
 

What does India's most powerful media independent have to offer on conditional access; on Sars; on the payouts being made to television producers; on IRS? How does this media powerhouse stay in touch with its customers?

All this and more WPP Marketing Communications CEO South Asia Andre Nair laid on the table in a no-holds-barred conversation with indiantelevision.com's Thomas Abraham, in this the conclusion of a two-part interview.

 

When we'd spoken last you'd mentioned oil prices internationally and the introduction of VAT domestically as being key issues that will affect this year's business? Well oil prices are down and VAT has been deferred so what is your reading now?
Regarding VAT, remember what I said the last time was - it is going to happen. The government themselves are saying that this is definitely going to happen. It is a more a question of how. The issue is how is it being explained to people, how is the mechanism going to work. There is still little clarity on that which is why you find interests fighting against VAT.

There are a lot or people out there, retailers in particular, who are genuinely clueless as to how they are going to introduce this and what it actually means. This is as much as I can say until there is further clarity.

 

While oil prices are down the bigger problem is SARS right now. Where are we on this businesswise?
We are back to where we were before the Iraq war. The war just raised a number of questions. We had a war that lasted 30 days and therefore the effects are short term.

As far as SARS is concerned, you look at the situation in Hong Kong and you have to ask yourself how did it hurt business in general? Yes, Hong Kong and Singapore have been badly affected.

Media meets and conferences have been cancelled. Tourism has been hit. Cathay Pacific has a load of 33 per cent after having been voted airline of the year last year. There has been a very severe effect on business as a result of SARS.

I however think that the media coverage was more virulent than the disease itself. Excessive hype has been created around a disease, which while having a high infection rate has a mortality rate as low as three to four per cent. The media just went berserk.

WHO has said that India is SARS free at least for the time being. In India media coverage did not go berserk the way it did elsewhere. This could be because it is not a priority as they have other more important issues to report about. Lets hope nothing drastic happens. We can spend much time contemplating the effect of widespread SARS infection in India but until, God forbid, that happens, such contemplation is useless.

 

 

"The problem of loss of creativity or lack of attention or lack of customisation can exist whether a company is large or small"

 

Coming to Mindshare & Maximize themselves, when your scale of operations is so big, how do you stay in touch with the ground? Isn't this a perfect recipe for insensitivity to clients' unique needs? I refer here to smaller clients and not the Pepsi's and Hindustan Lever's.
We are a large organisation and for us the issue is not just staying in touch with our clients but actually servicing our customers to build healthy and enduring relationships. So I would interpret your question of how do I keep in touch with my clients as how do I build and maintain healthy client relationships. It is very important and is one of our strategic priorities for this year.

We do this in a number of ways
Firstly our structure consists of three operating companies. Each company has their own business plans, their own KPIs (key performance indicators). Therefore, since each company has its own distinct character we are not one large faceless organisation.

Secondly, it's a issue of changing mindsets. Client service has always been thought of as a department within an ad agency- the account service department. Client service is not a department. It is part of what we all do in a service industry - as important as the media specialist sector.

To help change that mindset, we have set up a series of training modules on client service.

Training has to come with accountability. So thirdly, our managers have it down in their personal KPIs about building & maintaining healthy client relationships. Their performance is ultimately judged according to the state of the client relationship.

Feedback on the agency's performance and thus the health of the client agency relationship is vital. So instituting appropriate mechanisms to gauge the character of the customer agency relationship is the next step. The customer's point of view on the nature and depth of that relationship is vital. He is the end recipient of that relationship - he has to derive benefit. Therefore the performance of the agency needs to be evaluated.

Some clients have their own format to measure an agency performance and some don't.

 

"Client service is not a department. It is part of what we all do in a service industry - as important as the media specialist sector"

 

We feel that most client appraisals don't measure enough or are not specific enough for media specialist agencies. So, we have developed and introduced a scheme that covers all aspects of a media specialist agency's performance.

If you look at media, anything that has to do with numbers is eminently measurable and thus quantifiable and so it's easier to judge. At MindShare and Maximize, we've taken this a step further. The key is to create a series of SMART KPI's at the start of the year and then assess performance against them at least twice a year.

For the quantifiable aspect, we create a work plan together with our clients. We start the year by developing a detailed SMART work plan by quarter. These are clear statements laid out before the client regarding what needs to be done. All statements have deadlines as well as people responsible for getting the job done. At the end of each quarter plans are reviewed.

But, this is only covers the easily quantifiable side of performance
The other side of performance, which is not so quantifiable, is strategic thinking and service delivery.

For the unquantifiable, we have a slightly more general evaluation scheme. We lay out a series of criteria like quality of people, strategic service, innovative thinking, systems, finance, buying and implementation. We have statements through which clients rate us. Zero is 'bloody awful' while four is excellent.

These evaluation schemes are put together at the start of the year and the evaluation takes place either half yearly or yearly.

Finally, it's all about people dealing with people. My senior managers and I make it a point to have informal meetings with our senior clients to discuss work, our performance and the state of the relationship.

 

For the most part, when a business consolidates, even when a company consolidates, creativity is lost. In the US we've seen it with TV stations and radio stations. Specific to media planning and buying, it becomes all about processes rather than ideas. That extra something that is unique gets lost along the way. Your comment?
When you say that there is a loss of creativity when a business or company consolidates you are making a very flawed and sweeping statement. It is not universal to all consolidated companies and can be true of small companies. A small company with many customers may not have the resources or capacity to handle its clients' needs thus initiating an assembly line approach resulting in a loss of creativity.

The problem of loss of creativity or lack of attention or lack of customisation can exist whether a company is large or small. This is partially the reason, we have three operating companies. Each company is broken down into smaller operating units each having five offices and each office has its own set of clients. In fact, with Mindshare Mumbai, we have two SBU's.

Customisation, customer attention is not something we move off the rack. It is tailor made specifically for each customer and the brand.

 

Are customer handling mechanisms mainly done through software?
At the end of the day software can only help in certain areas. It can help make someone more efficient. It can help someone cope with administration or someone with numbers.

But you cannot build relationships using software. It is done between people either as individuals or groups. In the marketing communications business respect, ability to work with people is important. It is not just a question of the product.

This is something we are very conscious off which is why we put those feedback mechanisms in place. We cannot run away from the nature of client relationships whether it is excellent, good, average, bad and indifferent.

If it is good then the question is how can we take it to the excellent level. At the end of the day you can never take your customer for granted. That is really a danger. The second the customer feels he is being taken for granted you will know either by evaluation or if he walks out of the door and says "I do not want to work with you".

 

I would like to bring this discussion to conditional access and its implications. Some broadcasters have expressed fears that post-CAS Mindshare Fulcrum is going to push all advertising off pay channels principally onto DD and Sahara TV. Any comments?
We have never made such a statement nor are we contemplating any such thing. You know as much that is going on with CAS as we do. We are looking at it from the point of view of the implications to our clients' planning & buying and how we manage in a post-CAS era.

We are not making sweeping statements on a situation that is changing almost daily. CAS is a defining moment for the cable and television industry. The 14 July launch will happen.

Enough said as you will shortly get a comprehensive point of view from us.

 
"I am not against someone making hay while the sun shines but let us get down to today's reality. I think that production houses are in general overpaid"
 

Keeping to CAS, what is your reading of the scenario with respect to producers? Broadcasters have warned them that since the ad rates will go down they will not be able to continue paying them high fees. What is your reading of the situation?
For some time now the producers have been claiming they are hurting. The broadcasters do not pay them what they would like to be paid. The problem exists and I don't think that CAS is going to have a huge effect on the situation of producers. There is a worldwide rate for programming in different genres and some of the rates in India were well beyond that. I am not against someone making hay while the sun shines but let us get down to today's reality. I think that production houses are in general overpaid.

 

So are you saying that the cost of programming has actually come down?
Costs of production are certainly not spiralling. If anything, I would say over the last two, three years, they're a bit more organised in terms of how they manage costs and thus how much they charge. Everyone is learning to live with tighter budgets, more demanding channels, though there is lots of software to be produced. Big ones like Balaji operate almost an assembly line schedule and manage to produce a huge number of shows profitably.

And due to economies of scale, for a Balaji, say, costs are certainly not spiralling. This industry has grown to some 2,500 crores (Rs 25 billion). The need for television software is huge. And none of them should be complaining because if anything, they are being paid more through absolute volume rather than any one individual show.

For a channel like, let's say Star, who are demanding a hell of a lot more quality in terms of post-production, finish, etc, and they are willing to pay top dollar. People we've talked to like UTV or Neena Gupta are certainly not complaining. Or take the guys behind this new show Josh. They're being paid 15 lakhs (Rs 1.5 million) per episode, which is a lot of money. Here the channel is going and saying "look guys, if you can perform, we'll give you lots of money for production."

 

"The IRS report is a bungled thing and I am not the only person to say this"

 

This is striking. Do you agree or disagree with the whole idea of saying 'I'm willing to put top dollar for good quality productions'?
If it gets me the numbers, the audiences, sure I am. It's like saying that if someone had a budget of 5 or 6 lakhs per episode to produce a programme and it was giving me say, a 10 rating. Tomorrow, you go and tell him 'I'll pay you 15 lakhs', it doesn't mean that now you're going to get 30 ratings. Somewhere, there has to be a balance between what the advertisers want from the channel and what is there for the producer.

I'm saying these two things are disconnected. You certainly can produce very good programmes within the available budgets.

Someone may want to scale it up and make it a lavish international quality production. That doesn't mean you'll get three times the ratings. And the advertiser is not going to pay three times the rate for that spot. Somewhere it has to all work together.

 

I do not think it presupposes you're going to ask three times the rate for that spot, but one would certainly charge some sort of a premium.
Why would you? Finally what I am seeking are audiences. If I'm not going to get more, why should I pay more?

 
Isn't this the very reason why we have homogenisation of the kind of programming going out?
What is a programme put on air for? To be watched. What we're saying is, obviously quality programmes rate higher. Usually. But the fact of the matter is, that no one is going to accept a programme that is ten times costlier without the quality that is going to pull, in some projectible manner, an increased audience.

It's not as if we are a mercenary bunch of people. Everybody has the same objective. Of giving consumers something good to watch, and making that number of consumers large and viable enough to justify a price.

 

When we last talked, you'd said that there needed to be a shift in focus away from just TV. However, going by the latest IRS 2002 report put out by MRUC, it says that print is the only media vehicle that has shown an effective decline. Which actually brings TV back right up there again does it not? Unless you believe that direct marketing and outlet point interactions with consumers are going to make that much of a difference.
The IRS report is a bungled thing and I am not the only person to say this.

We subscribe to the NRS and the IRS full report is not out yet. So I withhold comment as to whether print has actually gone down or not.

We always deal with absolutes, which is where I sometimes feel that the industry does not look beyond the surface. People can be light or moderate or heavy consumers of a medium. So there are the various levels of consumption when you talk of print or the television.

You take your average television media plan and break its audience delivery up against the different consumption group. We are able to do this with an application called Viewer Graphics which breaks up the audience.

You over deliver against the heavy viewer who watches everything. Therefore by definition he/she consumes that much more of your product. For light viewers appointment viewing comes into play. "I want to watch this programme at 7 pm and that one at 3 pm." It can be done for newspapers. Light viewers are hardest to reach. As I had mentioned earlier there is no such thing as good or bad media. There are only inappropriate or irrelevant uses of media.

When we create a television or print plan let us not look at superficial average delivery of that plan. Let us break that delivery into its various target audience levels. If we are under-delivering for light viewers pumping in more money into television is not really going to reach them.

You would need to cover television for an entire day or buy all newspapers on one day. It is not just an issue of cost efficiency but also of profitability. I can introduce another medium to reach someone who is a light television viewer or a light newspaper reader.

Through research we can find out what a light television viewer reads or does otherwise. We did a big exercise with our Broadmind media unit on how to get more exposure against hard to reach consumers. The unit deals with non-traditional media.

The point I'm making is: You need to look beyond the overall consumption of newspapers or television and see the different levels of consumption.

 
You say IRS has bungled. That's a pretty strong statement.
When I say the IRS has bungled what I mean is their inability to answer or evade certain questions at their results presentation. They after all said they would issue a corrigendum, which the dictionary defines as an error to be corrected.

We had been subscribing to both IRS and NRS till 2001. We did our own validations and found the superiority of NRS in key parameter-Data consistency. IRS lacks consistency in the following points
1. Reporting
2. Software
3. Research agency partners.

NRS scores high on all the above key criteria. Its also implemented by the three big research agencies of the country and our belief is that hence the expertise of large and quality agencies are brought in with the final output of the survey.

Overall, we believe that the NRS information is very comprehensive. It is also accurate and reliable. It measures what is supposed to be measured over a period of time.

 
Critics would say you back NRS because IMRB and AC Neilsen belong to the WPP stable.
Of course our critics would say that. But lets separate fiction from fact. Firstly, there is another research company involved with NRS and they are TNS Sofres Mode. They are independent and have nothing to do with WPP.

Secondly, WPP has only a minority stake in AC Nielsen.

Thirdly, MindShare & Maximize are not the only ones to purchase NRS - there are over 20 agencies and 20 media owners who also subscribe to NRS.

We don't make purchase decisions on research or anything else based on what may or may not benefit our sister companies but on what's right for us and our clients.

Why don't you ask the others why they purchase IRS?

 

Isn't it a bit ironic that your biggest client Hindustan Lever subscribes to IRS?
Ironies abound everywhere.

But to answer your question: All our plans for Hindustan Lever are worked using NRS.

(Concluded)


Also read the earlier interview:
"We need to change our focus from just thinking about television" - Interview with Andre Nair (Part I)

 

 
 
Click for more MAM interviews
 

Email this page Print This Page Home
 
 
 

Contact Us | Feedback | About Indiantelevision | Disclaimer
© 2001- 2005 Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.