|
The sources said that a high-level meeting in this regard was held
at the Prime Ministers residence yesterday where this matter
was debated.
It is also learnt that Vajpayee, while expressing his unhappiness
at being target of a surrogate advertisment questioning his antecendents
during the pre-Independence days, would want the issue to be buried.
An ideal scenario would be to have the Supreme Court stay the order
of the Andhra high court, which removes the ban on political ads
to be carried o TV channels under the Cable TV Network (Regulation)
Act.
Amongst the several options discussed, the most plausible looked
like the one where the government or an organisation contested the
Andhra HC order.
Those who attended the meeting with the PM included his advisor
Brajesh Misra, information and broadcasting minister Ravi Shankar
Prasad, Solicitor-General Soli Sorabjee and Bharatiya Janata Party
president Venkaiah Naidu.
On 23 March, the Andhra HC, based on a petition filed by Gemini
Television Network, ETV and Maa TV which challenged rule 7 (3) of
the Act invoked by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry and
Election Commission to ban telecast of political advertisements,
quashed the ban.
The court also observed that the ban order amounted to discrimination
between the two media (print and electronic) and was also violative
of the right to freedom of trade and business.
Since the order was passed, the issue has snowballed into a controversy
with the Election Commissiona nd the government lobbing the ball
into each others court.
The issue of surrogate political advertisements is echoing not
in the Election Commission or on TV channels, but somewhere else.
The reverberations of personal attacks can be heard in the Prime
Ministers residence. Apparently, according to political sources,
PM Atal B Vajpayee is very upset that an ad allegedly showing him
in bad light did a round of TV channels before broadcasters decided
to take all such ads off air.
Stung by a surrogate ad put out by a Bharatiya Janata Party front
organization questioning party chief Sonia Gandhis foreign
origin, a seemingly front organization of the Congress hit back
by issuing an ad that dwelt on Vajpayees antecedents and that
he was allegedly involved as an informant for the British during
the pre-Independence days of India.
|