|
Armed with a written permission from the Election Commission on
political advertisements, given to it in 2002, Zee Telefilms feels
it could go ahead with political ads.
“We have a written permission from the EC itself, allowing us to
accept political ads till the time campaigning is allowed before
the actual voting. We have carried such ads in the past on Zee News
and on Zee TV and hope to do so this time too,” Zee Telefilms vice-chairman
Jawahar Goel said.
Though Goel insists that the almost two-year old EC missive to
Zee is still enforceable, till the time of writing this report,
the legal validity of EC’s 2002 letter could not be properly ascertained.
The EC was not available for immediate comments on Zee’s claims.
But legal experts pointed out that if a (favourable) Andhra Pradesh
high court ruling on political advertising on TV channels can be
bypassed on the ground that the court was not aware of the clauses
in the Cable TV (Network) Regulation Act banning political advertising,
the 2002 EC letter could also be treated as an aberration.
“Even the EC cannot go against the law of the land and, moreover,
the letter with Zee is now quite old to be upheld as implementable
now in a changed scenario,” a legal expert told indiantelevision.com,
adding, however, that the case needs to be examined further to arrive
at some concrete conclusions.
Still, Goel feels that such curbs on the electronic medium would
only give rise to more malpractices. “What would EC and the government
do if TV channels start selling editorial airtime --- take money
for airing the speech of a politician or a candidate --- in cash
deals where no documentation is kept?” Goel asked, pointing out
that curbs would only lead to “encouraging such deals, which would
be a slur on democratic processes.”
CAN GOVT. NOW AMEND RULES?
An interesting question that gets thrown up as the issue of political
ads is debated whether the caretaker government could effect amendments
in the existing rules and regulations --- may be through an Ordinance
--- to facilitate airing of political ads on the telly.
Senior government officials point out that it can be a possibility
if the pressure is intense enough for the President to promulgate
an ordinance, effecting changes in the CATV Act. But can such a
pressure be built up? Officials say that if all political parties
make such a demand, then the EC can call for an all-party meet,
deliberate on the issue and if there is wide consensus on allowing
ads on the telly, request the government to look into the issue.
In such a scenario, the government may recommend to the President
promulgation of an executive order in this regard. But the President
too has to be fully convinced that such an unprecedented step is
justified in the public interest and is of national importance.
The plausibility is there, but fraught with too many ifs and buts.
|