HOME | Free Newsletters | Email Story | Print Story | Comment on Story
 
Indiantelevision.com's Media, Advertising & Marketing Watch
 
Britain's new pastime: recreational grief
 
Indo-Asian News Service
(26 February 2004 2:00 pm)
 

MUMBAI: A social policy think tank has come out with a controversial conclusion: Britain is suffering from 'recreational grief', best symbolised by the outpouring after Princess Diana's death.

There is a culture of ostentatious caring where people indulge in 'recreational grief' for murdered children and dead celebrities in a bid to feel better about themselves, claims a report by Civitas, a think-tank.

 
 

Wearing coloured charity ribbons, holding silences for the Soham murder victims and joining anti-war marches are all symptoms of the country's emotional crisis, it added.

The no-holds-barred analysis of 21st-century Britain said such "hollow expressions of public caring" had been triggered by the decline of institutions which once gave meaning to people's lives, such as the family, Church and neighbourhood.

Public displays of grief, epitomised by the national mourning at the death of Diana in 1997, were phoney exercises in piling up "damp teddies and rotting flowers", it said.

The report said that such actions amounted to "grief lite", which was "undertaken as an enjoyable event, much like going to a football match or the last night of the Proms".

Author Patrick West said, "We live in a post-emotional age, one characterised by crocodile tears and manufactured emotion. Ostentatious caring allows a lonely nation to forge new social bonds. Additionally, it serves as a form of catharsis. We saw this at its most ghoulish after the demise of Diana. In truth, mourners were not crying for her, but for themselves. To judge by the 'outpourings of grief' ... one would have thought her memory would have remained firmly imprinted on the public's consciousness. Yet, on the fifth anniversary of her death in August 2002, there were no crowds, tears or teddies. Diana had served her purpose. The public had moved on. These recreational grievers were now emoting about Jill Dando, Linda McCartney or the Soham girls."

Civitas' 80-page pamphlet, titled "Conspicuous Compassion: Why Sometimes it Really is Cruel to be Kind", went on that while the Soham murders were "unquestionably tragic", it was "almost as distressing to see sections of the public jumping on the grief bandwagon".

For most of the 20th century, a minute's silence was observed on sporting occasions to mark the death of a national figure, while two minutes' silence was reserved to honour those who had died fighting for their country.

Today such marks of respect have become commonplace: "They are getting longer and we are having more of them, because we want to be seen to care."

For example, three minutes' silence was held to mark the 11 September attacks, and in 1999 mourners marked a rail crash with five minutes' silence. Another five minutes' silence followed for murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler in 2002.

"There is seemingly a case of compassion inflation, with individuals and organisations seeking to prove how much more they care by elongating the silences."

The wearing of charity ribbons serves to "celebrate the culture of victimhood" and an egotistical gesture to announce "I Care", said the report.

Again, 'going on demonstrations today is too often an exercise in attention-seeking', it said, as are forwarding e-mail petitions to friends.

West also criticised the trend for politicians and others to apologise for historical wrongs, such as Tony Blair's 1999 apology for the 1840s Irish potato famine, Australia's apology to Aborigines for colonialism, the Pope's contrition for a predecessor's treatment of Galileo and numerous Western apologies for slavery.

"Historical apologies are arrogant and anachronistic-minded," he wrote. "It is dangerous to judge the past on the values of today.

"The historical apologist is out for a cheap emotional fix."

 

 
Go to Top
Click for here more MAM Stories
 
Also Read: Headlines | CAS News | MAM Stories | Tube Talk | Technology Update | Perspectives
 
HOME | Free Newsletters | Email Story | Print Story | Comment on Story
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us | Feedback | About Indiantelevision | Disclaimer
© 2001- 2005 Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.