|
The
best performing channel in India is also the most disciplined.
A recent study by Madison Advertising lauds Star Plus for
having the shortest ad break lengths, giving advertisers
the best value for money while rivals Zee and Sony falter
on the ad break length owing to commercial compulsions.
The study, undertaken to analyse how the audience behaves
during TV ad breaks, has come out with some pertinent observations.
The study's conclusions assume greater significance in view
of the recent decision by both Zee and Sony to drop the
system of selling commercial time based on anticipated or
cost per rating point (CPRP).
Some highlights of the study -
-
Viewership of ads is lesser than that of the programme.
-
The extent of ad viewership is determined by the rating
of the programme and not by the genre of the programme.
-
The higher the rating of the programme, the lower the
drop in ad viewership.
-
Non C & S households and small town classes have higher
ad viewership in comparison to C&S households and metros.
-
Recall of ads deteriorates with the length of the ad break.
Star Plus has the shortest ad break length.
-
Corrector factor has been determined to calculate realistic
CPRP benchmarks.
Using
primary viewership data supplied by ORG Marg's INTAM, the
study found that the last two ads in any break were the
most advantageous from the advertisers' point of view as
these are the most watched. People tend to 'shift out' of
the programme with the commencement of the commercial break
and also towards the end of the programme. The build up
of audiences takes around three minutes and then a dip is
observed at the commencement of the ad break. Ratings then
build up after a programme restarts.
|
Position
in break
|
High Rated
Programmes
|
Others
|
|
1st
and 2nd ad
|
100
|
100
|
|
Middle
ads
|
88
|
83
|
|
Last
2 ads
|
103
|
102
|
The
data analysed establishes the relation between ratings size
and media effectiveness. Consequently, says the report,
higher rated programmes are worth higher CPRPs. The statistics
show that high rated programmes kept 87 per cent of the
programme audience through the ad, while a low rated programme
kept only 65 per cent.
Interestingly, the report notes that drop in ad ratings
is lesser for audience with no access to cable and satellite
channels. The average drop for non C & S homes is eight
to 10 per cent while it is in excess of 20 per cent for
C & S homes, necessitating differential media weights to
be fixed for C & S and non C & S homes by advertisers.
Afternoon programmes, the study notes, witness less of zapping
than prime time shows. The trend is favourable, says the
study, for targeting re-runs of popular programmes aired
in the afternoon slot.
Another pertinent observation of the study is that viewers
in small towns have higher level of ad viewership. This,
the study attributes to cable ops in smaller towns carrying
lesser channels than their big city counterparts.
Another pertinent observation of the study is that viewers
in small towns have higher level of ad viewership. This,
the study attributes to cable ops in smaller towns carrying
lesser channels than their big city counterparts.
Special interest channels like National Geographic and Animal
Planet do not have high ratings but register only a 10 per
cent drop in ad viewership. The study concludes that the
channels have an advantage in their ability to narrowcast
programmes and are able to convert audience interest in
niche programmes to continue through the ad breaks too.
Providing a historical perspective, the study compares the
trends in India with those in other countries. Commercial
air time in India is bought on a property basis, while elsewhere,
broadcasters sell on 'audience delivery' basis and hence
are forced to ensure high ratings for the commercial. Madison
Media though is hopeful that intense competition and emphasis
by broadcasters to shore up their subscription revenue will
eventually lead to a similar situation in India.
The study has also culled some observations from international
resources about audience behaviour in other countries.
-
Viewers do not prefer channels with absolutely no advertising.
Most viewers see ads in moderation as a welcome diversion.
-
The optimum ratio for well established channels is 50:10
- ten minutes of advertising in every hour.
-
Ad recall deteriorates with the length of the ad break.
-
Recall is higher if there is lesser number of ad breaks
in a programme. Two ad breaks in half an hour is found
to be tolerable.
-
Predictable and non intrusive ad breaks cause the minimal
negative impact on the ratings for the break.
-
US and European markets usually see a synchronisation
of ad breaks by most broadcasters, a practice not followed
in India.
-
In India, feature films have the longest ad break length
possibly due to the fact that film are popular among fringe
advertisers. Longer breaks in return are not likely to
be watched by viewers; consequently, the study notes,
it might not be a good idea to advertise during feature
films.
|