|
In
a competitive market, CNN-IBN's editor-in-chief Rajdeep Sardesai believes that
journalism has to be a collective enterprise. He also strongly feels that stories
that are in the public interest are overlooked by and large by the media because
of stiff competition, which is also reflective of lack of good editorial judgment. May
be he has an agenda. But he feels strongly about such things. Especially when
he points out that TV news channels cannot be "so competitive with each other"
that they overlook stories, broken by rivals, of national importance. At
CNN-IBN, a service of Time Warner and Television Eighteen, Sardesai leads a team
that is a mixture of young and new faces and old guards; symbolising energy and
experience. We are trying to bring in a certain passion and joy to news
and news gathering. Please come and share this experience with us. This is a journey.We
are not claiming to have arrived at our final destination. We are only claiming
to be a channel that is committed to news, the print journalist-turned-
a poster boy of TV news says. In
tête-à-tête with Indiantelevision.com at the sprawling and
swanky office of CNN-IBN in Film City at Noida on the outskirts of Delhi, Sardesai
dwells on his little-over-a-month-old baby CNN-IBN . Excerpts: How
does it feel, if I might use a TV news euphemism, to have completed a month in
the English news space?
It has gone well. But I guess you cant judge everything now. It is a work
in progress as far as we are concerned. So, everyday is a new day and a new challenge.
Ultimately it is for the viewers who has to judge. From our point of view, we
see this as a work in progress, which is a journey and not a final product. As
it is still in the process of evolution, where are the scopes for improvement?
I think there is a scope of improvement everywhere. Any channel wants to constantly
improve. The worst thing you can do in a (news) channel is be smug or complacent.
It has been a great month just in terms of big stories. But a lot still needs
to be done. It is not just about breaking stories, it is also about the entire
package. I
must admit that packaging is important, but ultimately its all about editorial
content. For us, that is critical. Everything else flows from making the content
as good as it can be. Still, we have to constantly improve. I wont go into
specifics, but I think the entire package has a long way to go. What,
according to you,can be improved content-wise? I dont think we can
say that this is what we need to do or thats what we need to do. As I said,
unless you realise that there is a large scope of improvement, you will never
improve. The easy and soft option for me is to say the product has been relatively
well received and people more or less have come up with great positive responses.
But there are lot of little things we need to keep enhancing and keep innovating.
The good thing is that we are a young product. Do
you really believe in the criticism that CNN-IBN carries some baggage from NDTV,
which has been your previous organization? To answer that realistically,
I think there is a format to 24 hour news channel that no one can really breakout
of beyond a point. To that extent, there will always be similarities. And NDTV
has been here for 10 years. I was in NDTV for 10 years. You will always look at
NDTV as a benchmark for excellence. But,
at the same time, those who see us, sees us as a different product. Certain things
will be similar because of the 24 hour format of news television, but there will
be many things that will be different. NDTV may do a good story one day and we
may put together another good story the next day. It is a constant process of
evolution. I think with every passing day people are noticing the differences
between us and other news channels. And, now with Times NOW coming up, Im
sure it will also have some great differentiators. The only beneficiaries out
of all this will be the viewers. What
is the USP of CNN-IBN? I think it is the four letter word called NEWS.
It is simple as that. Since
other news channels also claim the same USP, whats so unique? It
depends on how one treats the news ultimately. Our USP, or for that matter any
news channels, can be news aired on the channel. It is a question of how
you treat the news and what impact the news has and this may vary (from channel
to channel). Every news channel is going to say that news is its core value. It
is our core value too. News
channels will ultimately be judged on news. At times we forgot our basic purpose.
We get so carried way by the new celebrity cult or gimmicks that we forget that
what people actually want is news. People
turn to news channels ultimately for news. It is nice to have news-plus programmes
as they give you profile. We did one with Kapil Dev and Imran khan on Loc) and
got a huge response. Two former cricket World Cup captains for the first time
together
all that is great for profile. But on a day-to-day basis, those
are cherry on the top. But the cake has to be built by news and by journalists.
We can only claim that we are a group of journalists at CNN-IBN giving you news.
Rest is for the viewers to decide.
|
'I
think, the time has come to blend the strengths of Hindi and
English language journalism'
|  |
What
is CNN-IBNs target audience? Anyone who speaks English language
in this country is an audience for us. In fact, the best compliment I received
recently is that we are Aaj Tak in English. What we have managed to do is achieved
a certain pace and energy. Earlier you had asked for our USP, which is a certain
pace that we have. One of the goals for the channel is to combine the aggression
of Hindi journalism with the solidity of English. Its like combining the
aggression of a Virender Sehwag with the solidity of Rahul Dravid to produce a
Sachin Tendulkar. It is important that journalists have aggression. We
receive responses from viewers on stories that traditionally would have been covered
by Hindi news channels. I never understood the barriers between Hindi and English.
One of my goals is to break these barriers between Hindi and English (journalism).
We believe that for much too long English language journalism has been imprisoned
within an elitist cage and it is time to break free. We cannot talk down to viewers
anymore. When
did you realise theres a need to break the barriers between Hindi and English
language journalism? I always believed that this has to be done. Ive
been critisised at times for that, but I believed theres a need for robustness
and passion for news, which is reflected by Hindi journalism. I have never found
such passion in English language journalism by and large. I
think, the time has come to blend the strengths of Hindi and English language
journalism. I m not saying that English language journalism has no strengths.
What we at CNN-IBN want is to combine the advantages of Hindi and English language
journalism. I
will certainly like IBN to move into the Hindi news space. No doubt about that.
It is the only way forward. Though the Hindi market is an extremely competitive
one, it is a way forward.
What key benefits did IBN derive from the co-branding deal with CNN? What
we get from the deal is instant credibility. That the worlds largest news
network decides to tie-up with a fresh channel only goes to enhance our credibility.
But ultimately you will be judged on your day-to-day performance. Are
the ratings for the first month good enough for you? What more can you
ask? We have the Tam ratings that states NDTV has 10 per cent (market share)and
we have 8 per cent. For me, ratings will come if your product is good. We are
a four-week old product. I think the first battle that has to be won is that people
have to see your product as a serious news channel. I think, I would like to believe
that we have gone a long way in achieving that during the first month. Still,
theres still a long way to go. What has been the response from
advertisers so far? We
do not want too many ads at the moment. We want to provide our viewers with lots
of news. Eventually, we will have ads as we want to generate revenues too. A journalist-driven
channel is here to make revenues and we are confident of that. After
CNN-IBN what? Obviously one would like to grow. At the moment, we want
our small space under the sun. If you have a good product, there is space. The
advertising pie is large enough to be shared amongst existing players and sustain
everybody.
Also read: CNN-IBN: Combining
speed with solidity
|