|
Is it fair to say that IPG's reorganization of its media operations
represents the most significant example of support for those against
the unbundling of media that we have witnessed over the last 20
years or so? And extending that posit, can we then argue that making
media and creative interdependent is the best way forward?
Over the last decade we stripped everything out of an agency,
we have taken strategic planning, we stripped away media and now
they have basically become interchangeable parts, the 'value has
been devalued.' So what we are doing right now is we look at the
client, we look at the demands and pressures that they have, we
look at the environment that their end user works in and we say
'how do we change the game.'
This
might look like the old model but it's packaged in the new model
formulation, an offering of complete integration of products and
services but not doing it syllogistically under the model.
What
we are saying is that there is one management team, there's one
P&L and the palette consists of all the different skill sets,
so the clients don't have to manage all those relationships and
the agency can come back with a business solution orientation based
on the real business issues rather than the disciplines that they
are confident in.
Today
we often hear clients say, 'I want channel agnosticism and discipline
neutrality.' Yet there isn't really any channel agnosticism. We
didn't build organizations in the industry that way, we have people
that are proficient in strategic planning, in branding, in advertising,
in PR and in retail. Now they are asking for renaissance marketing
communications people, that's what this whole model is about, it's
about building another class of business builders in the marketing
communication field.
|