| Indiantelevision.com's
Interview with scriptwriter Ishan Trivedi |
| |
| "Reject
the clichés. Whatever comes to your mind first is the
easy way out" |

|
|
| Posted on 8 October
2003 |
| |
|
For
someone who was pursuing geology at Kumaon University in the beautiful
and quiet town of Nainital; National School of Drama (NSD)
sure was a different leaf to turn. And the turn has led him on a
different road - one he loves and lives on.
The creative brain behind more than two-dozen screenplays of
the episodes of Rishtey, Star Bestsellers, Saturday Suspense,
and X-Zone, Trivedi has also been penning shows like Ketan
Mehta's Mr. Yogi, Amol Palekar's Mrignayani, Manju
Singh's Ek Kahani and Darshan, Ajai Sinha's Samay
and the award winning Justujoo.
Apart from that, he has worked on the BBC sitcom adaptation
for Indian television One Foot In The Grave, Doordarshan's
popular cultural magazine Surabhi and a magazine
on environmental issues Bhoomi. He has also produced a daily
soap called Ye Dil Kya Kare for Zee.
Bolstering his career graph, are his stints as commissioning
editor with Star Plus in 1995-96 and Zee TV in 1996-97.
His ambit includes not only television but also extends to films.
Dialogues of blockbuster Bollywood movies like Ghulam, Aisa
To Na Tha (a film still in the making), among others come from
this man's creative juices.
Ishan Trivedi spoke to indiantelevision.com's
Richa Singh about his work and the issues that surround his
work. Excerpts:
|
| |
|
What brought you to scriptwriting?
I'm from Nainital and we had a theatre group over there. Since I
was interested in pursuing it as a career, I applied at the National
School of Drama (NSD) and got selected. That's how it all started.
At NSD, I had adapted a Scottish play. Somebody chanced upon it
and asked me to write a series called Bargad for Pradeep
Krishan. Arundhati Roy was doing the screenplay. Then in the late
eighties, I came down to Bombay and worked with Ketan Mehta for
about three years.
But what happened in Bombay is interesting. There were a lot of
writers in the industry, but not many respected deadlines. So if
somebody comes around with respect for deadlines, then work starts
rolling. That is exactly what happened with me. I don't know whether
I was good or bad, but I always wanted to make television serials
and films. I had specialised in direction at NSD. There was no course
in writing in those days.
|
| |
|
And now that you are on the faculty of a scriptwriting course
- Qalam 2003, what is the most important lesson that these new scriptwriters
can imbibe from your experience?
Reject the clichés. Whatever comes to your mind first is
the easy way out. It is something that you've seen and heard over
a period of time. It is déjà vu.
I think one should always be willing to break the 'set' mould. Only
then will you grow as a writer. Unfortunately, most of the times
the producers, channels, directors demand that 'this is what works
currently and this is what you have to write'. For me personally,
whether I'm successful or not, I've never been into trends. Agreed
that one has to write as per the market, but you need not cater
to the market all the time.
Second thing is that it is a discipline like any other job. Deadlines
are deadlines.
|
| |
|
You are very particular about timing.
I strictly adhere to the deadline, don't miss it even by a minute.
That is what makes me very popular among producers. And I realise
that most of us are cheating on that aspect because we take up too
many projects and don't really focus on what we should be doing.
Also, I sometimes feel that most writers tend to compartmentalise
themselves. Instead of interacting with the real world outside,
they are on their computer or notebook writing 10-12 hours a day.
That is when they stop growing and follow clichés.
Read as much as you can, see a lot of movies, theatre, and go to
a lot of painting exhibitions...
|
| |
|
So, basically you derive your learning curve from experience
and interaction.
A scene can be done in 50 different ways. So unless you start exploring
those paths you will dish out the same fare. It will earn you your
bread, but the growth stops. Television, as a medium, wouldn't grow;
films don't grow either.
|
| |
|
"For
a successful channel, even a slight drop in TRPs is like a
sword hanging on their heads"
|
 |
|
| |
|
Since you've brought up this correlation between clichés
and growth, what's your take on the fact that scripts often change
with TRPs because of channel interference?
Channels' logic is that they know what they are doing - their
jobs are at stake. So most of the times, channels dictate what they
think is right. But their point of view may or may not be shared
by writers or producers.
Of course, for a successful channel, even a slight drop in TRPs
is like a sword hanging on their heads. But at the same time, I
feel that there should be that space for conversation between producers
and channels.
|
| |
|
Do you view it as a compromise - as an encroachment of your
space?
Obviously yes. But since the channels help you earn your bread,
you can't afford to antagonise them. Nobody's going to say no to
what the channel demands. It's a sad scenario.
|
| |
|
But how significant are TRP ratings for you - do they influence
what you write or how you write?
To be honest, yes. If I'm writing a show like Justujoo,
which is appreciated by all and wins all the awards but doesn't
get high TRPs, it bugs me. In such a scenario, you are not very
sure whether what you are making is going down well with the audience
or is it just being watched by a niche audience. I think it is human
that you want to be popular and you want your programme to be popular
as well.
|
| |
|
Wasn't Justujoo meant for a niche audience?
No. A television programme is not meant for a niche audience unless
it's a commissioned programme for select audiences on channels like
BBC or Discovery or to some extent even Doordarshan.
|
| |
Currently, you are writing and directing
a licensed BBC sitcom for Star Plus - Kaua Chala Hans Kee Chaal.
What is it about and when can we see it?
It is an adaptation of Keeping Up Appearances. It was a hugely
popular programme way back in 1992 in the UK. It's about a woman who
wants to be what she's not. Her aspirations are page three aspirations.
In India, 'page three' is not such a known phenomenon. Even in Bombay,
not a lot of people would be reading Bombay Times, page 3. We have
made it keeping in mind the audience who don't.
We have wrapped up 13 episodes. In fact, deliveries will start some
time next month. Once they have a battery of four episodes, they will
slot it somewhere. |
| |
What has been your contribution in
the adaptation - have you taken a lot of liberties with the script?
Apart from direction, I am in the writers' team. I have written six
of the 13 episodes.
We also knew that the British sense of humour is not what would work
here. But then, because it is a licensed programme, we couldn't deviate
too much. At the same time, we presume that we know what our audiences'
tastes are. Accordingly, we converted situations and adapted characters.
The structure remains the same, but the tone and the humour changes.
The dialogues are 'Indianised'. |
| |
|
What are the other projects you are working on?
As far as TV is concerned, none. I am writing two films for Ajai
Sinha. One is Uphaar, which is about Indo-Pak relations and
the other is Stop, which is about friendship - you could
call it a crossover film.
Also I'm writing and directing a feature film called Sapna Hai,
Sach Hai, Kahaani Hai. I am in process of signing Irfaan Khan,
while talks are on with Govind Namdeo, Anand Desai, Vijay Kashyap
and Lalit Tiwari.
It's a small budget film scheduled to go on floor from 1 December.
It's about television channels and how they start dictating what
is to be followed by real people - how they get involved with reality
or the real world. It's an idea we'd been working on for the past
four-five months.
|
| |
|
Which genre do you enjoy writing for most? If you have to make
a choice, which one would you rather not do without?
A genre that is not happening currently, at least on TV - which
is - thrillers.
|
| |
|
But you do have thrillers Balaji's 'Kya Haadsa
' on weekends
on TV these days.
Not exactly those kinds of thrillers. But the real-real thrillers...
maybe a mystery. A thriller may not necessarily be about crime -
it can be about relationships also, probably like... Star Bestsellers.
|
| |
How has been the reaction to your
telefilms - audience as well as channel reactions?
Star Bestsellers were of 45 minutes duration. The slot was
meant for telefilms so the channel was calling them telefilms. They
were calling them telefilms because they were giving huge budgets
and were treating them as films. For a 90 minute telefilm, there was
no slot anywhere, ever. |
| |
|
So why do you think we don't have a market for telefilms?
The moment you call them telefilms people withdraw. In America,
they have channels showing alternative cinema where they produce
films exclusively for television. Big stars are called and huge
budgets are allotted.
In India, we have a very restricted market and the same people
are busy with television
so there is no time for alternative
cinema. Then again, the budgets are meagre. For instance Josh.
They had the budget, they shot it on film and they treated it like
a film. Whether it was good or bad, I won't be able to comment but
that is the treatment you need for a film. Even for series like
Kashmeer, the budget was not very high which means you make
a lot of compromises in terms of logistics, so neither became a
big game.
In America, even a Tom Hanks would appear in a television film.
That is the difference. People don't want to see the same television
actors repeating in a 90 minute film. So there's no difference between
television programmes and telefilms.
|
| |
Is writing satisfying in terms of
remuneration? What is the payment structure like?
It is a highly paying job right now. Writers are demanding their pound
of flesh and they are very well paid, at least on TV. They are at
par with any other profession. At times, a writer gets more than a
director does.
It usually goes from Rs 5,000 to Rs 40,000 per episode. |
| |
How about the new writers - are they
getting a raw deal or are they paid as well?
In the beginning, people are exploited. But slowly as you prove your
worth, you can start demanding from five - seven to 10 - 15.
Way back in 1989, I used to get Rs 2,000 per episode. |
| |
 |
"Writers
are demanding their pound of flesh and they are very well
paid, at least on TV"
|
|
| |
How much time does it take for you
to pen an episode?
I am one of the slowest writers. For one episode, I take two to three
days. There are people who are writing two episodes in a day. |
| |
What about the quality of output?
If they are talented, why not? |
| |
What are the other problems you faced
as a writer in this industry? How do you deal with them?
I think the biggest problem is of perception. If you are the person
who's paying me, it is you who is calling the shots, dictating the
structure of the episode, the emotional spine and the spectrum. Sometimes
a writer feels like breaking out but is not allowed.
But TV has been good to writers as far as getting payments is concerned.
In films, it's a big problem, say, if you sign a contract for Rs 100,
most of the times you wouldn't get more than Rs 50-60. That is the
most frustrating aspect of film writing. Films have their own clichés
but there are times when you can really achieve something that has
never been done before. In television, it is very restricted. |
| |
So how do you switch on and off between
television and films?
Because of television, I can survive. If I were only exclusively writing
for films, I would not have. |
| |
Survival - as in steady income?
Film producers are cheaters! Most writers in films are getting four-five
lakhs and even that is not being paid to them.
You prepare a draft, fulfill your commitment but there is no cheque.
Then dishonesty creeps in the whole deal. They always say 'the story
is the star' but then what about the writers who create that story.
Of course there are pretensions in television too, but then television
pays the writer. |
| |
|
So quite evidently, you enjoy television more than films.
Yes, I've written very few films. I do get offers for films but
they are fraught with danger.
Once I was promised five lakhs after a lot of bargain. But I got
only one lakh.
|
| |
Seems like you have burnt your fingers,
and you still want to work for films. Why?
I have burnt my fingers all the time and it does put me off. But right
now I'm directing my own film and for producers who are very honest
in their dealings. |
| |
Does the credit given to a television
writer justify the effort put in?
In the credit scroll, my credit comes just before the actors. In television,
writers are respected. Of course, no one will come for autographs
because they don't know the writers. Even the media doesn't talk much
about scriptwriters. But if you go to the sets, everyone gives you
that respect because they know that you are the one who is creating
the story and their characters. |
| |
|
"I
don't think we are a nation that is interested in literature
at all"
|
|
| |
|
Our scripts don't draw on our rich Hindi and regional literature.
Why?
But how many amongst us know who are the prominent names in literature?
I could tell you instances when people have asked me who Premchand
is! 'Is he a producer?' I don't think we are a nation that is interested
in literature at all.
There is no market for literature. It is only in the second stage
where you turn literature into a visual medium.
How many people buy literature? How many buy books? In India, very
few.
|
| |
If you were to make a literature based
script, who's literature will it be?
I would prefer Jaiprakash who is a new wave writer. But I don't think
it will happen. (Smirks) Nobody would allow me to base my script on
some literature piece. |
| |
Do you think 'different' story ideas
like Sony's 'Jassi...', which is an adaptation of Yo Soy Betty
La Fea, will play a role in freeing the script from the saas-bahu
shackle?
I was supposed to be one of the writers for Jassi..., but I
didn't have time for that. It is a good sign that people are liking
something that is different from the saas-bahu sagas. If more
such stories work, the programmer's point of view will change. But
in the meanwhile, a whole lot of generations get sacrificed. If a
change comes after 15 years, scores of writers will be finished and
done with by then. |
| |
Do you think this is parallel to the
similar phenomenon of crossover films - is it a passing fad or will
it stay?
It should stay and it would stay because of the market's own logistics.
You can make a film in Rs 20 million. But because of the viability
such kind of films are produced. If out of 20, one film clicks, it
is better than one out of 100 similar plots. I hope it stays because
it gives a person like me scope to write different stories. |
| |
| Click
for more Writer Interviews |
| |
|
|