Television

"Three CAS models suggested because no one formula would work all over the country" : TRAI members including chairman Pradip Baijal

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/smartcrop_800x800/public/images/tv-images/2016/10/04/Untitled-1_2.jpg?itok=ajt6yGWN

Broadcast and cable TV regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has finally come out with its much-awaited recommendations. On first reading, the report is likely to create more confusion, rather than clear doubts in the industry.

But Trai, headed by a former bureaucrat, Pradip Baijal, is convinced that the recommendations could be the best that could have been offered for an industry that has been unregulated for over a decade during which time it has grown into a humungous one with a turnover of over Rs 150 billion.

Even as journalists grappled with the executive summary of the Trai recommendations, which were lengthy enough, here's what transpired at a press conference that was addressed by Trai members on various issues relating to the recommendations that were submitted to the information and broadcasting ministry today.

Excerpts from the interaction:

 

What are the recommendations all about?

Pradip Baijal (PB): Cable television has been an unregulated sector, but even in that mode it has done a great job --- gone over poles, over trees, over rooftops. But the industry today manages a turnover of over Rs 15,000 crores (Rs 150 billion) with just over a decade of existence in an unregulated era.

Now, keeping this overview in mind, we would not like to go for over-regulation. The recommendations here today present that viewpoint.

 

Would you care to explain the broad points that the executive summary is enlisting, considering that itself is so exhaustive and confusing?

PB:
If that's the consensus, then I'd start off by saying that regulation has to be an evolutionary process. It cannot be --- rather should not be --- suddenly thrust on an industry that has survived almost 15 years in an unregulated mode.

Here again, I'll explain that cable TV is a popular medium of entertainment and information and India, probably, would be the only country in the world where there is more cable connections than fixed-line connections.

If you read the recommendations carefully, you'll realise that we have created an enabling regulation. We also have taken into account future aspects like convergence. If things work out, then a cable TV provider may be able to provide telecom services too (vice versa too would hold good) under the unified licensing regime.

As far as the 'must provide' clause is concerned, we believe that this would ensure availability of all types of content to the consumer. We also have suggested changes in DTH guidelines, which may help the industry and the way pricing should be done, has been suggested with a view to benefit the consumer too.

 

Why has the Trai suggested three models for the country, shying away from anything definitive and creating more confusion in the government's mind?

PB:
If there were simple answers for the cable and broadcast industry, we would have provided them. Or, at least, tried to do so. Why only in India, the world over countries are grappling with regulations regarding this sector. India, would be the 136th country in the world to be going in for some regulation for this sector.

Now, to answer your question, three models have been suggested because we feel no one formula would work all over the country because the realities are different in different parts of the country. Conditional access worked in Chennai for a different reason. But the same could not be said so easily about

Delhi.

 
In case of price ceilings, Trai has said that new pay channels would have to go through boxes on a mandatory basis, but what about those channels, like HBO, which are hopping bouquets? (HBO is to change over from One Alliance to Zee Turner.)

HV SINGH (secy-cum-principal advisor, Trai): Good question and valid one too. But if you read the report, it says quite clearly how the pricing needs to be done and we have suggested an idea, not provided a formula. In the case of HBO, as mentioned by you, the movement will work out to zero vis-?-vis additions and subtractions of channels from a service provider's list, so HBO's price can remain the same. Rather, being a stand-alone channel can benefit HBO more.
 

But what about those channels like Zoom TV, which have been newly launched, but has no precedence of the same genre of channel whose pricing could be used as a bench mark?

P.B:
Look, if the industry does not get such ideas, you'll give them by asking such questions and raising these issues. But a good question. If there are some disputes relating to any particular case, the regulator would intervene and we'll settle it on a case-by-case basis on receiving complaints.

If there are complaints relating to Hungama TV, for example, on pricing we'd look into it and decide a rate.

 

What's the reason for Trai not doing anything on regulating the quantum of advertising on pay channels?

P.B:
Nowhere in the world do such caps exist. It's best left to the industry and the audiences to decide.

RAKESH KACKER (advisor, Trai): There's an option for the government to regulate advertising time and ads on TV channels. If it wishes, it can exercise those powers under various Acts to bring in a legislation.

 

"Full choice only when there is full addressability"

DPS Seth (member, Trai)



Pradip Baijal
 

Does Trai believe that CAS would become a reality, considering most state governments would not like to have it?

P.B:
CAS would gradually come and spread and I think it's the best way forward. It would bring about more transparency and less intervention from the regulator.

 

Do you really feel the government would accept the report in toto? Which CAS model is most likely to find acceptance?

P.B: That is for the government to answer as the ball is always in the government's court. But in the short-term, we feel that all models (suggested) are likely to co-exist.

 

As far as the 'must provide' clause is concerned, don't you feel, it may end up giving some advantage to an existing player and DD, which is proposing free DTH service?

P.B:
The advantages would be there for everybody. Since there is only one DTH licencee, it anyway, has the beginner's advantage.

 

Would the 'must provide' clause be applicable to a cable op, for example, if he doesn't have the capacity to transmit beyond a certain number of channels?

P.B:
If somebody doesn't have the capacity to do something, you really cannot force him to do so. But if a cable operator has the capacity, then he must show all the available channels.

RK: What you are saying can be solved with digitisation. It's a separate exercise that Trai is undertaking. (Trai has sought consultants help to prepare a report on migration from analog mode of technology to a complete digital one.) But to answer your question, the capacity or the infrastructure would decide carriage of channels.

 

On 'must carry' again. If everything is to be made available to every platform, where does that leave exclusivity?

PB: You are talking about exclusivity from a broadcaster's point of view. We are here to benefit the consumers and ensure that he gets maximum choice. This clause is aimed at enabling that only.

Moreover, we are not in favour exclusivity and exclusive rights, etc. Then Trai would have to decide the definition of `exclusivity', which we would rather not get into.

 

Do you really think the consumer would end up having choice after your recommendations are implemented?

PB: Choice would come only when an addressable system is there. But, I do think that Model 1 looks like a practical one.

Latest Reads

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/internet_0.jpg?itok=svZSUYza
A contemporary take on love online: COLORS launches Internet Wala Love

There was a time when shyly exchanged handwritten notes and a dropped handkerchief from a girl for her beau would be the onset of a potential relationship.

Television TV Channels GECs
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/cosmos_0.jpg?itok=l4MPCf5G
Cosmos-Maya: The shining success story of the Indian IP Creator

Cosmos-Maya, the market leader in original Indian Kids’ animation content recently celebrated its 22ndAnnual Day.

Television TV Channels Kids
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/kerala.jpg?itok=ZjRI8l4B
K Madhavan presents the cheque to Kerala CM Shri Pinarayi Vijayan

Star India today announced it will increase its donation to Rs 5 crores for the CM’s Distress Relief Fund for the relief and rehabilitation efforts in Kerala.

Television TV Channels GECs
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/lo.jpg?itok=PCeprOUH
Facebook to sub-license La Liga India broadcast rights to Sony

Social media giant Facebook, which recently acquired the Indian sub-continent La Liga rights for three years, has struck a sub-licensing broadcast deal with Sony Pictures Network (SPN) India, a source close to the development has confirmed to Indiantelevision.com.

Television TV Channels Sports
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/zee.jpg?itok=XgE_eIOq
Zee Telugu’s legendary dance reality show Aata Juniors makes a comeback this weekend!

Aata Juniors, one of Zee Telugu’s iconic dance reality shows is making a comeback to the channel starting this weekend! Zee Telugu pioneered telecasting non-fiction shows at prime-time which has now created a top-of-mind recall among its viewers across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

Television TV Channels Regional
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/KPL_2018.jpg?itok=35iawwK0
Star Sports announces a blockbuster line-up of renowned cricket commentators for Karnataka Premier League (KPL) 2018

Showcasing a blockbuster line-up of 12 renowned cricket experts, Star Sports announced the commentary panel for KPL 2018 which began on 15th August 2018. For the first time ever, Australia’s bowling legend Mitchell Johnson donned the commentator hat.

Television TV Channels Sports
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/La_Liga.jpg?itok=cex1S5sq
Facebook to sub-licence La Liga to broadcaster: Report

Social media giant Facebook took several industry pundits by surprise when it acquired the India sub-continent rights for La Liga's 380 league matches for the new season, which commenced on Friday. It is now being reported that the league's broadcast in India will not just be limited to the social...

Television TV Channels Sports
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/21/money.jpg?itok=rwQ2fDKF
Moneycontrol collaborates with Thomson Reuters to offer StockReports to its customers

Moneycontrol, India’s leading financial and business digital platform, has collaborated with Financial and Risk business of Thomson Reuters to offer StockReports on its platform. StockReports powered by Thomson Reuters, is updated every day to facilitate unbiased comprehensive analysis of stocks,...

Television TV Channels News Broadcasting
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/20/news.jpg?itok=A70B5KqH
News18.com Announces iReel Awards 2018 - The One of Its Kind Web Series Awards in India

News18.com, one of India’s leading breaking news websites with over 100 million unique visitors announces iReel Awards 2018, web series specific awards in India.

Television TV Channels News Broadcasting

Latest News

Load More

Sign up for our Newsletter

subscribe for latest stories