|
However, the delivery medium is challenging,
says Aditya, as pipelines are choked and
these are controlled by monopolies. If telecom
companies get into the business of delivering
broadcast television, that is something
that the regulator should look at. Also
the consumer does not have the choice in
terms of service provider though he is spoilt
in terms of content at his disposal.
The
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India opened
a consultation among the stakeholders last
year on the cross-media ownership issue.
"We
held an Open House discussion in December.
Trai has taken the views of 35 stakeholders.
We will then offer recommendations to the
Information and Broadcasting ministry. The
aim is to push for more diversity and plurality,"
says Trai advisor Parmeshwaran.
While
there is no restriction on horizontal cross-media
ownership, the Indian government does not
allow broadcasters to own more than 20 per
cent in a direct-to-home (DTH) company.
Indian
companies like Times of India Group and
Essel Group have business interests across
print, television and radio.
Offering
a foreign perspective, Federal Communications
Commission chief, media bureau Monica Desai
says that the US media watchdog in 2007
relaxed the ban on cross ownership between
newspapers and television. Under the new
rules, broadcasters in the nation's 20 largest
media markets can now also purchase newspapers
for their business. However this rule is
being challenged in court and so it has
not come into effect. Other existing rules
are also being challenged.
There
is also an ownership limit on national television
in that an owner can't reach more than 39
per cent of the TV homes in a market. An
entity can own two stations if the entire
local market is not being covered. There
also have to be eight independent stations
in a local market, says Desai.
Ofcom
in the UK will review media ownership rules
this year. In France, a company can control
two out of three media vehicles - print,
television and radio.
|