Indiantelevision.com's News Headlines
 
NDTV refutes charges as advocate claims Rs 500 million damages
 

Indiantelevision.com Team

(1 June 2007 9:45 pm)

 

NEW DELHI:Denying charges of any collusion with prosecution counsel, senior advocate RK Anand said today that he had served legal notice seeking Rs 500 million as damages from NDTV, accusing the news channel of defaming him by telecasting a sting operation relating to the sensational BMW case.

"NDTV should apologize for misrepresentation of facts," he said in a statement.

Meanwhile, NDTV has handed over all unedited footage to the trial court as well as to the Delhi High Court and "we will follow the legal process in this case," said Barkha Dutt, managing editor of the channel.

A former Member of Parliament, Anand is defending the main accused Sanjeev Nanda, grandson of former Navy Chief SM Nanda.

He and senior advocate IU Khan, now dropped as Special Public Prosecutor, were shown in the sting operation as purportedly trying to influence Sunil Kulkarni, a witness in the case.

Demanding apology for "misrepresentation" of facts, Anand said "I regretfully state that NDTV has put its reputation at stake by relying upon a person like Sunil Kulkarni, whose character and intentions have been doubted not just by media, courts and police but by the NDTV itself.

No money has been paid or any attempt is made to influence any of the witnesses. I am made to pay the price of my background and status. This is most unfortunate and aimed at influencing the courts of law by a side and motivated trial in the media," the lawyer said.

Dismissing Anand's allegations, Dutt said "We have clarified already on our channel that not a single paisa has been paid to Kulkarni nor did he asked for any money, car, hotel and other expenses."

Dutt said the editorial control of the story including the scripting, presentation and the angles of discussion have been NDTV's editorial decision and not Kulkarni's. She termed Anand's allegation that NDTV had transferred the powers of journalism to Kulkarni as "baseless".

On the contrary, Kulkarni despite having given consent earlier had asked NDTV not to broadcast the tapes. "We disregarded this in the interest of justice. While NDTV cannot vouch for the integrity of Kulkarni as a witness, it did not alter the larger "alarming" questions raised about the role of the public prosecutor and the defence lawyer, she said.

Go to Top
Click for Headlines Archives
Also Read: