IBF calls for broader consultative participation on Broadcast Bill

MUMBAI: The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) is crying foul against the Broadcast Services Regulation Bill, 2006. Submitting a detailed proposal on the Bill to the information and broadcasting (I&B) ministry today, the IBF suggested a broader consultative participation among all the stakeholders before framing the regulations. Its complaint: the proposed regulatory framework would restrict the growth of the broadcasting industry.

"We welcome the attempts of the ministry of information and broadcasting to consolidate various codes and guidelines under which our members operate, through one umbrella law, and believe that a single window approach would benefit the industry. However, in the interest of ensuring long term sustainability and growth of our industry, any new regulatory framework needs to be preceded by a thorough analysis of the broader issues facing the industry. A consultative process is especially critical since our industry is still in its infancy," the IBF said.

Stressing on a law that would also facilitate a self-regulatory process in the industry, the IBF raised some "critical" issues that needed to first be resolved in the interest of all stakeholders, before further steps were taken to regulate the broadcast services.

The IBF expressed discontent over proposed regulations on content and commercial time and felt the Broadcast Bill would impose arbitrary restrictions on the expansion of media companies.

"Media businesses require huge capital investments, with business plans that have long gestation periods, often ranging up to ten years or more. Any impediments, therefore will retard the growth of the media industry, and affect the efficiency of the media business and the ability of consumers to receive high quality programming through a variety of delivery platforms at reasonable prices," the IBF said.

As the regulations would require a complete restructuring of India's broadcasting industry, the IBF feared it would lead to a loss in revenue and downsizing.

"It is also important to note that there are presently a number of business arrangements between broadcasters and cable operators with shareholding patterns that are in direct conflict with the proposed provision in the Bill. Similarly in the absence of alternative arrangements, and with the knowledge of the government, many broadcasters have set up captive earth stations/ teleports to uplink their own channels, which in practice may run counter to the mandate of the proposed Broadcast Bill," the IBF said.

The IBF is against the mandatory sharing of sports programming with Doordarshan since it is in conflict with intellectual property rights (IPR) of those who hold the telecast rights. Besides, this is against the trend of recent judicial pronouncements by various courts in India.

The IBF has recommended that a standalone law be enacted for public broadcasting (PB) after appropriate deliberations, in line with several jurisdictions abroad.

"Doordarshan should not be allowed to compete commercially with other channels if it is truly to be a public broadcaster. "It should be subject to a PB regulation that needs to be developed under the aegis of the independent sectoral regulator to ensure that it fulfils its role as a public broadcaster," IBF pointed out.

The "must carry obligations" should only apply if at all to true PBs. A channel that competes for advertising revenues should definitely be excluded from being further extended the advantage of being compulsorily carried, as this skews a level playing field and is an impediment to the commercial business of broadcasters, cable operators, as well as the consumer's right to watch channels of choice.

"The present structure of the Broadcast Bill seems to provide rights to Doordarshan without any reference to the issue of consideration, and is therefore arbitrary, anti competitive, and will impede the free flow of funds available to Indian sports today. This anomaly needs to be addressed especially because Doordarshan has a commercial motive and generates separate revenue from such feed by selling advertising space while re-broadcasting such feed," the IBF pointed out.


The IBF supports the merger of the role of the Broadcast Regulatory Authority of India (Brai) into the Press Council of India which has a significant representation from the members of the industry.

"It is imperative that any regulator should be independent and not serve any single vested interest, whether the government, the private sector or the consumer. In this regard the process of appointment and the term and tenure of members of such a regulator are critical for ensuring that a regulator serves its purpose of maintaining a balance of interests," the IBF said.

The regulatory and adjudicatory powers of any regulator for the broadcasting industry also should be separated and specific.

Latest Reads
Terry Burns appointed Ofcom chairman

Lord Terry Burns has been appointed as the next chairman of Ofcom. This follows the digital, culture, media and sport committee pre-appointment hearing with Lord Burns. Karen Bradley, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, has now confirmed the appointment.

Regulators People
FCC outvotes 2015 net neutrality rules

NEW DELHI: American telecoms and broadcast regulator FCC on Thursday voted out the 2015 Obama government’s regulations relating to net neutrality, which, some critics said, put too much power in the hands of broadband companies to influence consumers’ online experiences.

Regulators People
MIB bumps up TV channel processing fee

The ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) has sharply increased the processing fee for TV channels in supersession of an order dated 1 January 2009. Now, national channels will have to cough up Rs 100,000, while regional ones will shell out Rs 50,000.

Regulators I&B Ministry
VTV & DY365 to go off air for violating programming act

In two separate cases, the ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) has asked channels VTV and DY 365 to be taken off air.

Regulators I&B Ministry
Jio continues leading broadband subs addition while wireline internet loses subs in Oct

Mukesh Dhirubhai Ambani’s Reliance Infocomm Limited (Jio) closed the month with 145.96 million wireless broadband subscribers having added 7.34 million subscribers during October 2017. Since 1 January 2017, the new telecom behemoth has added 129.91 million subscribers between 1 January 2017 and 31...

Regulators TRAI
I&B tightens up on condom ads on TV

MUMBAI: Condom ads are off prime time television. The latest advisory from the information and broadcasting (I&B) ministry has asked broadcasters to keep them out of the purview of children and only telecast them between 10 pm and 6 am.

Regulators I&B Ministry
MIB consolidates media units

MUMBAI: The ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) has integrated the Directorate of Film Publicity (DFP), Song and Drama Division (S&DD) and the directorate of audio visual publicity (DAVP) under the banner of Bureau of Outreach and Communication (BOC). The media units, which promote...

Regulators I&B Ministry
'Sanskari' India wants condom ads off primetime

MUMBAI: India is a country that takes offence at the slightest suggestion of titillation. The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has approached the ministry of Information and broadcasting (I&B) for withdrawing condom ads that are telecasted during prime time or ‘family viewing time...

Regulators I&B Ministry
TRAI sees merit in using satcom for broadband delivery

NEW DELHI: India needs to create digital platforms, pushed by government policies and private sector entrepreneurship, which are specific to India and address its specific needs, telecom and broadcast regulator TRAI advisor SK Singhal said on Wednesday, adding that affordable broadband and allied...

Regulators TRAI

Latest News

Load More

Sign up for our Newsletter

subscribe for latest stories