Regulators

Delhi High Court, Tdsat refuse to grant stay on Cas

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/smartcrop_800x800/public/images/tv-images/2016/05/31/Delhi%20High%20Court.jpg?itok=45CO-lu7

NEW DELHI: This seems to be the last word on Cas (conditional access system). The Delhi High Court and Tdsat (Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal) today made it clear in separate verdicts that Cas had to roll out on 1 January, ending the efforts of broadcasters and some multi-system operators (MSOs) to obtain a stay.

The High Court heard arguments in two appeals clubbed together, filed before it against the roll out of Cas, while Tdsat heard appeals against the tariff rate being fixed at Rs 5 per channel as well the interconnection order by Trai, regarding sharing of revenue between the MSOs, last mile operators (LMOs), and the broadcasters.

The Delhi High Court, refusing to grant more time to MSOs, said that there is no question of Cas not being rolled out on the notified date. It asked the two petitioners to file replies which will be heard after the court vacation ends.

Star Broadband Services, a MSO in Delhi whose licence for operating under Cas had been cancelled by Trai in an order dated 14 December, had moved the court saying that it was getting ready for Cas roll out but needed more time.

NGO Shakti had filed application seeking postponement on the ground that the MSOs were not yet ready with the infrastructure for Cas implementation on the due date. Hence, Cas should be postponed indefinitely.

Meanwhile, in a separate hearing, the Tdsat declined to grant stay on an appeal filed by ESPN and SET Discovery.

The Tdsat sat through the final arguments by Trai and MSOs and the rejoinder by the broadcasters (ESPN and SET), and asked them to file written submissions, to be taken up after the vacation, but said that nothing that would be argued or heard later would mean that Cas will not roll out on the impugned date.

The Tdsat had been told earlier by the broadcasters' counsels that there was no rationale in the tariff fixed and that the Chennai model, where Cas had been found to be effective without Trai intervention in pricing, had left the subscribers happy. The broadcasters held that the 'facts' shown by Trai and the 'assumption' on which they based their order were mutually contradictory.

The counsel for SET Discovery dubbed this as non-application of mind, and said this was unacceptable when Trai is issuing such a momentous order that would govern the industry for a long time.

The counsel for the broadcasters said that Trai's fixing of price was based on such arbitrary assumptions that went against the survey report quoted by the Authority itself.

The Trai senior counsel, in his argument yesterday, had caused a flutter in the court, showing that the broadcasters had completely failed in Chennai and that only 3.7 per cent of the total cable households there had opted for pay channels because the prices fixed by the pay channels were too high.

This revelation had almost every sit up, and the judges had asked whether this means that Chennai cable homes had the option of both CAS and non-CAS operation. Trai senior counsel Rakesh Dwivedi said that was correct, and that the vast majority had not take the offer.

Dwivedi also argued that the Chennai model in any case could not be extended to Mumbai, Kolkata or Delhi, as in Chennai, four out of the five most popular channels are FTAs, and only one of the top five is a pay channel The case is the reverse with the other three metros.

In fact, he argued that by fixing the ratio of revenue sharing at 45 per cent, Trai had actually given the broadcasters three benefits at one go: it has got rid of underdeclaration as a perennial problem; cut out 'piracy' that broadcasters had accused LMOs of indulging in; and given them a 300 per cent rise in their revenues.

He argued that the broadcasters had complained that under the present system of operations, the LMOs and MSOs retain 85 to 90 per cent of the revenue from subscriotion, and only 15 per cent reach them, and that too becomes difficult to collect. "We are ensuring them a 45 per cent share and besides, the bulk of their revenue, as they claim, from advertisements remains intact," the Trai counsel said.

The counsel for SET Discovery today in his rejoinder said that while Trai had the legal authority to fix the tariff, it was the manner in which that had been done that bordered on perversity.

His argument was that the Trai had itself admitted that there was not enough material on which the fixation was based.

The SET Discovery counsel held that Trai had been referring to a document, an IMRB survey that was two and half years old and today could not be valid, since so many FTAs have now become pay channels. He said also that the budgets of households had increased manifold and that Trai had fixed the tariff without adequacy of material to support that pricing.

Besides, the Trai had so long not brought up the issue of the IMRB survey, which had not been mentioned in the Consultation Paper issued by Trai, nor in later discussions, and was only using it to justify a wrong decision taken without any basis.

The SET Discovery counsel also held that the Trai itself had repeatedly admitted in the court that any price fixation is arbitrary. The price, thus, fixed could not be held to be legal.

SET Discovery's last plea was that Tdsat should ask Trai to undertake a fresh survey and base the new tariff fixation on that. He said that actually the price fixed should be around Rs 10 per pay channel, and that if the price is fixed now at Rs 5, then there would never be an upward revision, even if Trai held a review. Public ire would prevent that upward revision, if Trai did the review at all, which he doubted would ever happen in actuality.

Latest Reads

http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/13/vi.jpg?itok=LJJ0mOpc
Parliamentary IT report cites high charge by Antrix as hurdle to satellite connectivity

Despite the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) citing high cost of satellite-delivered bandwidth to reach remote areas for providing broadband services, parliament’s committee on IT has observed that prohibitive cost should not come in the way of availing of the services as adequate funds are...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/11/cinema-hall.jpg?itok=omMZ5AyB
SC stays J&K HC order to not prohibit outside food in theatre

MUMBAI: The Supreme Court has stayed a direction issued by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court to the multiplexes/cinema hall owners of the state not to prohibit cinema goers/viewers from carrying their own food articles and water inside the theatre, as per a report by the Indian Express.

Regulators Supreme Court
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/11/bigtv.jpg?itok=Xxkx2vCF
MIB gives permission to four new channels

For nearly a year, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has been stingy in handing out licences to channels. But in July, four new channels got permissions and none were cancelled.

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/10/Rajyavardhan-Rathore.jpg?itok=VU2pppQu
Does govt propose to regulate kids' channels? MIB says 'no'

NEW DELHI: Do watching cartoons have lasting effects on the children? Has the government made any assessment regarding the impact of cartoon channels on kids? Does the government propose to regulate/limit the telecast of cartoon programmes by private channels and Doordarshan in accordance with the...

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/09/rs.jpg?itok=X0Bm3DMA
RS Sharma re-appointed TRAI chairman till Sept 2020

TRAI chairman RS Sharma, whose last day was today has got an extension till 30 September 2020.

Regulators TRAI
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/09/sharma.jpg?itok=2f1Y4pac
Being pro-consumer does not mean one is anti-industry: TRAI chairman RS Sharma

Outgoing TRAI chairman RS Sharma, whose tenure saw major, at times controversial, decisions on issues like termination charge and predatory pricing, on Wednesday said he is of the firm belief that being pro-consumer does not mean one is anti-industry.

Regulators TRAI
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/09/ss_0.jpg?itok=Q3-uhdbG
Meity says no proposal presently to tap WhatsApp messages

Though the Indian government continues to explore avenues to track digital footprints of the citizens and regulations for online media, it said on Wednesday it did not plan at present to tap people’s WhatsApp messages.

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/07/mib.jpg?itok=nbysFyKz
MIB seeks details to simplify forex payments for broadcasters, teleport ops

In what it says is aimed at further easing norms for doing broadcast business, the government has asked for particulars from TV channels and teleport operators using services of foreign satellites for uplinking and temporary uplinking so payment of foreign exchange processes could be simplified.

Regulators I&B Ministry
http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/340x340/public/images/tv-images/2018/08/07/whatsapp.jpg?itok=oBZ73_II
DoT seeks views on blocking mobile apps like FB, WhatsApp

India’s telecom department has sought views of the stakeholders on technical measures that can be adopted for blocking mobile apps like Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Telegram. The proposal has been questioned and criticised by a large section of the industry and civil society, including chamber...

Regulators I&B Ministry

Latest News

Load More

Sign up for our Newsletter

subscribe for latest stories