|
"I am inclined to conclude that the series of events, which
have ultimately ended in the termination of the tender process was
unjust, illegal, and was the result of bias against Zee Telefilms.
I am even prepared to assume that Dalmiya did not have a good opinion
about Zee Telefilms capacity, capable of satisfying the international
standards and quality of televising the matches and honestly believe
that the petitioner was not up to the expectation," an agency
reported, quoting the judge, stated, which is a clear indictment
of BCCI's former president Jagmohan Dalmiya.
"The conduct of the president of such a big institution should
be above board and cannot act in unethical manner resulting in causing
loss to the petitioner," the judge added.
Reacting to this development, Zee Telefilms spokesperson Ashish
Kaul said, "The court judgement is a clear reflection of our
belief that BCCI was biased against Zee Telefilms. Now, the whole
world knows that BCCI is marred with mismanagement."
On being asked by indiantelevision.com whether Zee would
seek damages, Kaul added, "Yes, we can now sue the BCCI for
damages and are presently discussing the development with our management
and legal advisors"
BCCI could not be contacted for comments till the time of writing
this report. Though Zee was officially mum on it, court sources
told indiantelevision.com that in its affidavit, the petitioner
had sought financial relief of about Rs. 2 billion owing to BCCI
canceling the tender process, which had seen Zee Telefilms emerge
the highest bidder with a quote of $ 308 million for four years
of Indian cricket from 2004.
Also read:
Prasar
Bharati to telecast, production BCCI's choice
Madras
High Court verdict on television rights Thursday
Telecast
row: BCCI says keeping all options open
Let’s
resolve cricket telecast issue: Zee to BCCI
Zee
Vs BCCI case hearing continues Friday; Pak tour delayed
Madras
HC restrains BCCI from awarding telecast rights till 17 February
Cricket: Zee moves Madras High Court
|