|
Presently host city organising committees are entitled to 49 per
cent of the income raised from broadcasting with, with the balance
retained by the IOC for distribution to international sports bodies.
But after the Beijing Games there will be a change in the rules
entitling host cities to a fixed amount of broadcasting rights revenues,
rather than a fixed percentage of TV revenues.
Another report indicates that the cost of broadcast rights in the
US for the 2010 and 2012 Games have risen 46 per cent to $2.2 billion
from the last Games. In Europe, they have risen 30 per cent to $746
million and in Canada they have doubled to $153 million.
For the IOC, which first sold television rights to the BBC in 1948
for a little more than $A5,000, the sale of Olympic broadcasting
licenses is now a hotly contested and jealously guarded multi-billion
dollar enterprise. Indeed, it has become the largest single income
earner for the IOC, far surpassing direct sponsorship, ticketing
and other sources of revenue.
In the past the licensed media corporations have strongly protected
their turf. They have regularly made it clear to the IOC that any
weakening of their monopolies would reduce ad revenue, undermine
the market price of broadcast rights and sponsorship deals, and
thus lower the IOC's income.
In 2000 unprecedented restrictions on other media companies had
led to conflicts—and particularly with the scores of Internet sporting
news sites that wanted to provide coverage of the event.
Meanwhile Telstra may play a key role in the bidding for the Australian
broadcast rights to the 2010 Winter Olympics and the 2012 Summer
Olympics, which for the first time will include the rights to Internet
broadcasting and mobile phone content. Telstra owns the Nine Network.
|