|
“We are also conscious of possible claims from those who assisted
us with funds and irrespective of the results of the present case,”
Chandra hammers in a point, adding, “If claims are made against
us, it would further complicate matters between the Board and us.”
The letter goes on to add, giving the tale a truly soap opera and
swadeshi twist, “We are sure that there being no truly other
competing Indian channel in the fray (other than Indian pubcaster
Doordarshan), there is no legal impediment in the Board arriving
at some reasonable arrangement with us.”
In its wisdom, the BCCI did not reply to Chandra’s letter, subsequent
to which another letter from Zee followed 15 days later. This too
has drawn a blank from the BCCI that, anyway, met in the Capital
earlier this week to discuss various matters related to the up and
coming tour of Pakistan to India.
BCCI’s failure to respond to these letters raises the question
as to why the Indian cricket board is not acknowledging the letter
when the other side is expressing willingness to discuss the issue
and settle it amicably.
Efforts made by indiantelevision.com to elicit a response from
the BCCI on the Chandra letter drew a blank.
To do a quick recap of the cricket telecast saga, last year after
the bids for the rights opened, and after a lot of backroom drama,
Zee Telefilms emerged the highest contender with a revised quote
of $ 308 million, closely followed by ESPN Star Sports. BCCI announced
its decision to award the rights till 2007 to Zee when legal doors
were knocked by various parties.
After the Supreme Court recently refusing to accept the BCCI as
a 'State’ under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution, Zee moved
the Madras high court against the BCCI, which had cancelled the
bids, claiming breach of fundamental rights under Article 226 of
the Constitution.
The petition was filed on 7 February in the Madras HC.At the hearing
on 9 February the judge passed an "unconditional" interim
order "restraining BCCI from negotiating or getting into any
kind of contract with anyone regarding the award of telecast rights
till further notice."
The case came up for hearing on 17 February and the argument will
continue on 21 February. Meanwhile, the BCCI has admitted that it
has incurred a loss of Rs 1,500 million so far due to the telecast
rights not having been awarded far in a proper way. In a letter
to Niranjan Shah, Secretary of Saurashtra Cricket Association, BCCI
secretary SK Nair admitted that the on-going impasse over the telecast
issue has resulted in a loss to the Board.
Nair, in his letter, stated that Doordarshan would be paying Rs.
1 billion for the terrestrial rights of the matches against Australia
and South Africa and another Rs 300 million is expected from the
sale of overseas rights.
"Therefore, if we assume that Rs 2,75 crore (Rs 2,750 million)
would have come from these two series if the four-year deal was
through, the ad hoc arrangement for the Australia and South Africa
series had fetched Rs 125 crore (Rs 1,250 million) and, therefore,
the total loss was… say Rs 150 crore (Rs 1,500 million)," Nair
has informed Shah.
As the telecast rights issue returns, like Banquo’s ghost, to haunt
everybody, including the Indian public, before a cricket series
begins, it seems like time to set things in order once and for all.
Also Read:
Zee
Vs BCCI case hearing continues Friday; Pak tour delayed
Madras
HC restrains BCCI from awarding telecast rights till 17 February
Cricket:
Zee moves Madras High Court
BCCI
not a 'State': Supreme Court
|