|
This particular part of the proposed legislation is contained in
the draft uplink and downlink policy that is now being studied by
a group of ministers headed by defence minister Pranab Mukherjee.
The I&B ministry has backed its proposal by asserting that
similar dispensation is available in the UK, Australia and Ireland
and in the European Union (EU).
“The EU in its 'TV without Frontiers’ directive had asked its member-states
to make available suitable provisions in their domestic legislation
to ensure that important events are available to the general public
on a free to air basis,” the note asserts.
The government has proposed that a list of sporting events of national/public
interest will be notified as soon as a Cabinet nod is obtained without
waiting for an omnibus legislation being planned.
Interestingly, in its submission to the I&B ministry, Prasar
Bharati has said that the bundling of satellite, Internet and terrestrial
rights by rights holders (read, private sports broadcasters) is
“not a healthy practice” for the pubcaster.
After having listed some reasons given by private broadcasters
in getting all the rights of an event, Prasar Bharati goes on to
add that whatever may be the reason, “it would be a good idea to
pin down the rights holders to prevent them from packaging.”
And, why doesn’t Prasar Bharati bid for rights (cricket rights
to be specific) since that is what rolls in the moolah?
Prasar Bharati has justified its stand thus: “Uncertainties in
the events finally happening, which is not uncommon, makes the entire
exercise speculative with high risks, which is generally not appreciated
by the Comptroller and Auditor general of India since it tantamounts
to playing with the taxpayers’ money.”
Further, it has been pointed out that no public broadcaster in
the world has bid for such rights sold overseas by any cricket board.
Also Read:
BCCI
drafts tender for telecast rights
|