|
Panelists will look at filming and production incentives in Amsterdam,
while issues of financing and digital rights management will be
discussed along with technological trends.
Speaking on the state of the Indian film industry this morning
at the Ficci-Frames, IFA brand ambassador Bachchan said that the
critics of the film industry have been silenced and a bright future
awaits the industry, provided some more changes in the attitude
is brought about.
"The prophets of doom have been silenced. Indian cinema will
be bigger than Hollywood in 2020. Our cinema which is an instrument
of social change is increasingly being viewed with empathy,"
Bachchan said, indicating that entertainment will be a key driver
in the new economy.
"As long as there is self belief and self sufficiency we can
turn fantasy to reality. Tomorrow we might view a classic on a wrist
watch. Having said that we must not get carried away by technical
gizmos. The 35 mm screen is the ideal way to view a film,"
he said.
However, Bachchan did admit that the film industry does not always
function as a cohesive whole.
"We are splintered into factions. Our vocabulary defines us
as being glitzy, moody and self indulgent. We must change the definition
to include the words hard working and combative. That is because
how we view ourselves will shape how we behave," he hammered
in a point.
He was also critical of the film industry using terms like crossover
cinema, which, according to him, display a condescending and patronising
attitude.
"We have as many quality films as Hollywood. Indian popular
cinema has become 'cool' in the eyes of the world. We must
sustain this 'cool wave'. The critic who says that popular cinema
has no deeper meaning, cannot see anything positive in entertainment.
The success of Devdas and Lagaan has shown that we have potential
to reach the overseas market.
"Therefore it is imperative that our marketing and distribution
strategies be on the ball. The curiosity of foreigners can be exploited
in different ways," he added.
PIRACY CONCERNS MPA
Meanwhile the Motion Picture Association of America (MPA) president
Daniel Glickman dwelt on the menace of piracy at the Ficci Frames
and urged measures to arrest this trend or the entertainment industry
will have to face huge losses.
"Piracy is seen as a victimless act. Copyright theft damages
a creative society. The fact is that for every Tom Cruise making
$20 million, there are 500,000 people struggling to earn a livelihood.
So every pirated good and download hits them hard," Glickman
said.
Last year 225 million pirated discs were seized in China and the
American film industry lost $903 million in revenue from Asia in
2004. The total estimate is $3.5 billion.
" Any European or American film can be found on DVD in China
within days of its release. I urge your government to bring up the
issue of piracy during trade dialogues with China. It is also important
that global law enforcement
agencies share knowledge with each other," Glickman pointed
out, giving the issue a political touch too.
He added that recently the MPA had launched anti piracy trailers
in cinema halls across Asia. The message: if a person does not steal
a car or a mobile phone, then why does he/she steal a film?
From Malaysia six million pirated discs were seized last year.
600,000 of them were Indian. In Holland last month, 150,000 pirated
Indian discs were seized.
Another problem for him is the peer to peer sharing on the Internet.
In the future, with technology rapidly advancing, it would be possible
to download a film in 90 seconds.
On a more positive note, the MPA executive said that movies "feed
the imagination and soul." Bollywood and Hollywood have a shared
vision of entertaining and making money.
In an aside, Glickman also brought up broadcasting issues and expressed
concern over the Indian government trying to fixing the ceiling
on channel prices and having an interconnect law, which says that
content must be provided to a distributor on request.
" There is no precedent for this anywhere in the world. Also,
this will not benefit the consumer," Glickman said, reiterating
some of the submissions that the MPA had submitted to broadcast
regulator some months back on the same lines.
|
