|
It's been a long and winding road for the Modis in this case which
is a fallout of ESPN's decision to terminate its distribution deal
with the company in 1999.
A statement issued by Modis quotes Judge Gammerman as ruling:
v All excepting one small claim of the Modis is within time and
not barred by the Indian Law of Limitation.
v New York Law would be applied whilst adjudicating on the breach
of contract claims and the tort claims.
v In India, the Supreme Court of India would have recognized all
claims made in the action.
v Punitive damages would be awardable in this action.
The Judge has also ruled that punitive damages may be allowed especially
in view of the evidence supporting the conclusion that ESPN intentionally
and fraudulently misused their contractual audit rights to force
MEN to divulge their confidential information and thereafter used
such information wrongly.
The case comes up for its first hearing on 26 January, industry
sources say.
|