Having zoomed to the No. 2 spot in about four months
time, as Kohli would like to assert --- competitors' and critics'
sniggering, notwithstanding--- the time has now come for consolidating
the little gains and further
broadbase the viewership by giving content that the "viewers
want to watch and not what we want to show as a channel."
More importantly, Kohli is not averse to discuss controversies
surrounding Star News and the company, Media Content Communications
India Pvt. Ltd. (MCCS), that has been licenced the Star News brand
to run the show from India.
"We got off to a great start and the operation is now settling
down, living up to the channel's philosophy `aap ko rakhe aage'
(keeps you, the viewer, in step with time). The machinery is pretty
oiled now," Kohli explains in an interview to indiantelevision.com,
sitting at Star News'
spacious-but-now-looking-cramped office on Delhi's Parliament Street.
She also feels that the "viewer is better served now"
with competition all around, and the "innovations" that
Star News has tried out are bearing fruit. "We don't want to
do what others (news channels) do. We want to do things the people's
way. But I agree that our style is less formal and less conventional,"
Kohli opines.
More than the people, Star News is building programmes as brands
like the National Reporter ("the closest that we come
to conventional news format"), City 100 and Star
Reporter. "Remember most news channels are known by the
programmes they air and not by the people they have," Kohli
says, adding quickly that there would always be exceptions to the
rule.
Still, in India it seems to work the other way round. People would
like to watch the faces they know, identify with and believe in
rather than just programmes on certain news channels. People would
like to watch Prannoy Roy, Rajdeep Sardesai and Naghma on NDTV's
channels; Prabhu Chawla, Deepak Chaurasia and Gautam Roy on Aaj
Tak; Larry King on CNN or even Suneet Tandon
on Doordarshan.
Kohli is quick to add that most of the names that can be considered
brands were built over a period of time and at Star's expense. "We
are still a young channel to have people as brands; some of them
like Ajay and Aparna are already quite popular. Moreover, many of
the people who are considered brands today have been built up by
Star after spending huge amount of money on promotion and marketing
over the years," she points out.
According to Kohli, though Star News is not cutting down on outsourcing
or putting a complete stop to it, but the natural ending of Rajat
Sharma's contract for Aaj Ki Baat later this year is because
of the tight budget the channel is working on. Especially for the
type of show that Aaj Ki Baat is.
"It is a news show, something that we can produce in-house
with the infrastructure at our disposal. With the type of budget
that I have, I cannot afford to have outside producers producing
news shows for us," Kohli says.
Some celebrity-anchor shows like Akbar Ka Durbar and Vir
Ke Teer on Star News are produced by Star News with MJ Akbar
and Vir Sanghvi being guest anchors like Vinod Dua on Kaun Banega
Mukhyamantri. Rajat Sharma's
Independent Media Pvt. Ltd is producing Aaj Ki Baat, at the
moment.
Selective outsourcing like crime show Red Alert and Mera
Gaon Mera Desh would continue on Star News owing to the reason
that the manpower and networking that is needed for such programming
is too much for Star News to handle at present.
Asked if the single largest Indian shareholder in MCCS, Suhel Seth
(with 30 per cent stake) is likely to end up with 51 per cent stake
to conform to the revised uplink norms, Kohli says "various
options are being studied."
She adds: "Our lawyers are studying the revised guidelines
and various options. But if you ask me today whether Suhel would
be the majority stakeholder, then I cannot answer the question because
I myself don't know the answer."
However, she feels that the controversy surrounding Star News was
"not needed" and also that the company does not (DOES
NOT) think the Indian government is out on a witch-hunt.
"The sequence of events (leading up to the controversy) reinforce
that Star News has made a great impact (on competition), but the
government has the right to set guidelines and we'd conform,"
Kohli states, adding that she, as a resident Indian, is fully in
control of Star News channel and has "never been told by Star
to do something or not to do it."
Kohli would also like the industry to collaborate on coverage of
big events, which are not breaking news, so that huge resources
are not duplicated by various news channels.
"It's (collaborations) done abroad and I think we should do
it in India too, instead each of us ending up spending huge amounts
on coverage of big and planned events that cannot be termed breaking
news," she explains.
As a first step in this direction, she points out, for example,
an exclusive interview of Leander Paes from the US recently was
a collaborative effort between Star News and Sahara Samay, the news
channels operation of the Subrata Roy-promoted Sahara Group. "We
got the interview recorded in the US and split the cost. The interview
was run on both the channels with each other giving the other credit,"
Kohli says.
Considering that Star News is being regarded by a section of the
India media houses as a `national threat' that is making a "monkey
of Indian laws", such collaborations may go a long way in soothing
ruffled feathers. Any more takers?
Also read:
Rajat Sharma, Star News
to part ways
|