|
Confirming the same to indiantelevision.com, SET-Discovery India
president Shantonu Aditya says: "There are two reasons - non-settlement
of the outstanding dues of Rs 20 million for the month of March
and non-renewal of the agreement contract which expired on 31 March
2003. Actually, we have been giving them signals in good faith for
an entire month in the absence of a proper contract," says
Aditya.
InCablenet, in its response has raised the imminent rollout of
CAS as its reason for not signing on to a new agreement. A statement
issued by InCablenet says: "With a few weeks left for the introduction
of the conditional access regime, broadcasters have gone on the
warpath with MSOs. Broadcasters have started making a demand for
higher connectivity and higher rate per customer, which InCablenet
has, in view of the resistance by customers, refused to accept.
The statement also drew attention to the the hearing of public
interest litigation tomorrow before Bombay High Court demanding
reduction of cable subscription rates, as another reason for not
reaching agreement with SET-Discovery.
According to InCablenet, with CAS around the corner, commercial
arrangements in a post CAS regime are what need to be discussed.
Aditya, however, dismissed this line of argument saying an agreement
has to be in place because services are being rendered and it is
not possible to function in the absence of a formal contract.
Aditya confirms that the two parties failed to reach a mutually
acceptable figure as far as the disputed amount (of Rs 20 million)
was concerned. "We are hopeful that the issue will be resolved
soon. Despite repeated assurances, we haven't received payments
- which are actually ground collections. We believe that the issue
of under-declarations is still unresolved," says Aditya.
Aditya, however, mentioned that Incable Network had settled all
the previous dues. He added that the representatives of both the
affected parties have been conducting talks and have had several
discussions.
The One Alliance team has also prepared itself for piracy related
problems and illegal stealing of signals. "Copyright laws have
been strengthened in recent times," Aditya says.
Speaking of piracy, an ESPN official has filed charges in three
different police stations in Mumbai alleging theft of the ESPN Star
Sports signals.
In turn InCablenet COO Rajiv Vyas and vice-president (operations)
Manoj Motwani, have obtained anticipatory bail from a sessions court
in Mumbai. The ESPN official, Prakash Shinde, in his FIRs, filed
in Mumbai’s Ghatkopar, DN Nagar and MIDC-Andheri police stations
last week, has said InCablenet was tapping signals from neighbouring
operators in violation of Section 51 (a) and (b) of the Copyright
Act.
|