| CANNES:The
US was rocked in the sixties and seventies by a killer who either
stabbed or shot his victims who were mainly young people. He
left behind notes with code written on them, threatening further
consequencs if the newspapers did not publish the code on their
front pages. He killed close to 13 people and he called himself
the Zodiac. The case was never solved, and is open to this day.
It
obsessed several individuals, one of them - a cartoonist -
so much, that he went onto pen two non-fiction books on the
killings, the investigation. And it also inspired filmmaker
David Fincher to make a film called by the same name and based
on the books.
The
film screened at the Cannes Film Festival yesterday. Fincher's
effort is one that is engrossing, enrapturing, shot with attention
to detail, to maintain the era that was the seventies, and
make it look very real. Costumes fit the times, the locations
have been recreated to suit the 70s. There has been no effort
to fictionalise or glamourise the times.
The
story has obsession with a mission as the central theme running
through the movie. The efforts of the various individuals
to nail and nab the murderer over the years go to make the
sub stories or sub plots. Whether it is the detectives David
Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) and his partner William, or it is San
Francisco Chronicle crime reporter Paul Avery (Robert
Downey) or it is the cartoonist Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal),
their key motive is: pursue and capture the heinous murderer.
In the process, they nearly destroy or destroy their personal
lives.
Of
all the actors Downey Junior shines bright, bringing absolute
realism to his performance as the journalist who gets burned
out by his own doggedness, wrong turns, and a not so cooperative
administration. He has at times good moments with Toschi followed
by confrontations when he goes to the press with a lead which
probably takes the case in a wrong direction. He turns to
alcohol, finally giving up his job to work at a lowly paper
and goes to seed.
Ruffalo
is also very believable in a downplayed performance. In the
beginning he mumbles but then picks up speed as the movie
goes along.
But
for me it was Gyllenhaal who is the standout. First as the
cautious and unsure but clinical cartoonist who has a penchant
for solving quizzes and riddles, then transforming into an
amateur detective pursuing a criminal and finally into a novelist
who wants to get at the bottom of things, searching for every
clue with a comb and in the process "look at the killer
in the eye, in the face."
Which
we presume he does finally.
A
flaw with the film is its duration: 158 minutes of it. It
could have been made shorter, some scenes and subplots could
have simply been edited out. For instance, some 30 minutes
of the film are spent on following a certain line of investigation.
At the end of it all, the main players discover, the line
was wrong. Despite its length, it continues to grip the audience
and that is to David Fincher's credit.
|